Show Your MemTweak Here !

[WhitePaw]

Is this your set of ram's?

Just Upgraded.. ?? lookin gooood.....

Will not hijack your thread more..

see you later.... ;o)

[naitco]

Is this your set of ram's?

Just Upgraded.. ?? lookin gooood.....

Will not hijack your thread more..

see you later.... ;o)

What is it ? :O
my english so bad . . i dont understand . . i just us google translated
i from Indonesia . . nice to meet you

[WhitePaw]

Same to u my friend...^^

ahh, Indo

I would LOVE to go to mt Kinabalu, or sulawezi sometime.. And photograph plants, and wildlife..
Chat with the locals, and get a nice traditional haircut..

Have to schedule that, in the near future

haha bring back memorys, i have been in Idia a couple of times..

And the last time i needed clothing..

Well, no money, But made a swap with the local tailor..

He got a Swedish porno magazine, and 1/4 bottle Gucci perfume, and a broken cassette radio..+ a cheap watch from gull

2 days later, he dropped by my house, on he's scooter..

And i got 2 complete dresses, made from Kashmir fabric, and other local extremely nice materials..

2 years later i was in India again, and passed through that little hard to reach village again, when walking on a narrow path, down by the ocean. I heard my name, from behind... And behind me was a couple of really sweet and happy looking girls..

Bring back mem's...

^^

Some called me Babu.. I never got it explained.. never asked..

[ClairHardesty]

My score best score so far is here http://rog.asus.com/memtweakit/p/935 but that setup does not result in my fastest memory throughput. I think there is a fundamental problem with the equations being used for the score calculations. The RefreshInterval is used on the bottom of the formula, so longer times between refresh cycles result in lower scores and vice versa. This is contrary to real world performance. The more often the refresh cycle occurs (lower interval), the lower performance will be because refreshing interferes with throughput. I get (sometimes much) higher memory throughput by using higher (10k-12k) DRAM Refresh Interval settings than with low (500-2500) settings. I use SiSoft Sandra to measure memory throughput and get around 52GB/s with 2133 DRAM and 10K RefreshInterval. With it set as it is in my high scoring (126246) run at 660, my throughput drops to only about 24GB/s because of all of the refreshing. If I go any lower, the system comes to a virtual halt because it is doing nothing but refreshing. Setting too high a number will result in data loss because the refresh will not happen before the memory fails. The is a point where higher intervals do little to improve throughput and setting the interval there will be a good place for performance/data integrity trade off. Also, if I plug the stated equations into Excel, I get different numbers than those reported by Mem TweakIt (v1.01.7) so there must be more to the calculation than is being revealed to us. For those of you with the highest scores, please try setting the DRAM Refresh Interval to a high number (8k-12k) and see if your system gets faster by any other measure of memory speed.

[samual]

I can't get my cas low enough but here is the best i've been able to tweak:

memtweakit.JPG