PDA

View Full Version : Nvidia GeForce 306.23 WHQL Driver Has Arrived



PILGRIM
09-13-2012, 03:29 PM
The latest WHQL driver by nVidia has arrived.
It's also compatible with the soon to come Windows 8.

http://www.geforce.com/drivers/results/48693

(Currently downloading it for testing later.)

EDIT: I just saw the G55/G75 Forum has a similar thread.
I was thinking of having this thread deleted.
But on second thought, it might serve those who just frequent
this "Older G Series Notebooks" Forum and nowhere else.

Lempziv
09-14-2012, 12:58 AM
Thanks for the information.

As soon as you have an opinion about the new driver please let us know about your computer performance.

PILGRIM
09-14-2012, 05:26 PM
Have installed this latest driver for a day now.
I know, it's still too early to say. But so far, so good.

Temps are a bit cooler, especially on real-time gaming.
Idle temps: 40C min - 45C max / Gaming temps (Skyrim): 43C min- 66C max.

On my fave game (NBA 2K12), 60-73 FPS (similar output with nVidia 306.02 BETA).
On Skyrim, 25-51 FPS (about +10 FPS improvement from the older BETA version).
I don't do benchmarking- rely more on real-time output.

Overall impression- it's stable.

Don't know why, but the PhysX software wasn't there after installation.
So had to download it here: http://www.nvidia.com/object/physx-9.12.0613-driver.html

Boosted_R
09-14-2012, 06:32 PM
Yet to find a driver as faultless as 295.73............ If it crashes let us know.

Lempziv
09-14-2012, 11:21 PM
I decided to install the new driver as well. I'm playin Gotham City Impostors and the computer performance hasn't had a noticeable improvement in the maximum fps (everything high) but I have realized that when playing, the gameplay is in some way better, maybe more stable. The temp seems to be a bit cooler specially in idle, under load I don't see a big difference because when I'm playing, the max temp is 72 C which is the same temp showed with the last driver I was using (304.41). I saw an important improvement when playing Splinter Cell Conviction because the rig gave me (+6-8) fps with everything maxed out (max temp 64 C ). About the problem with the PhysX, I didn't experience it, I downloaded the driver from Nvidia's website. My opinion up to this moment is that it is a good driver, no problems, and the games are performing a bit better. If I experience some kind of issue, I'll let you know.

kimiraikkonen
09-15-2012, 09:58 AM
Have installed this latest driver for a day now.
I know, it's still too early to say. But so far, so good.

Temps are a bit cooler, especially on real-time gaming.
Idle temps: 40C min - 45C max / Gaming temps (Skyrim): 43C min- 66C max.

On my fave game (NBA 2K12), 60-73 FPS (similar output with nVidia 306.02 BETA).
On Skyrim, 25-51 FPS (about +10 FPS improvement from the older BETA version).
I don't do benchmarking- rely more on real-time output.

Overall impression- it's stable.

Don't know why, but the PhysX software wasn't there after installation.
So had to download it here: http://www.nvidia.com/object/physx-9.12.0613-driver.html

Can you detail the PhysX issue? Is it something like in 301.42 which misses to install Physx even you select it when you attempt a custom installation by selection?

My thread was similar what you say:
http://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?22631-301.42-PhysX-bug!-Interesting-Story!

Did you make a full driver install and GPU-Z or NVCP shows Physx as installed?

PILGRIM
09-15-2012, 01:01 PM
Can you detail the PhysX issue? Is it something like in 301.42 which misses to install Physx even you select it when you attempt a custom installation by selection?

My thread was similar what you say:
http://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?22631-301.42-PhysX-bug!-Interesting-Story!

Firstly, I uninstalled all the nVidia drivers (306.02 BETA) in Windows Programs and Features,
including the PhysX software. Next, rebooted in Safe Mode, used CCleaner and Driver Sweeper.
Rebooted in Safe Mode again, installed the newer WHQL driver.

But when I did the Custom Installation, the PhysX software wasn't there.
So I was thinking maybe it wasn't included in the bundle.
Proceeded and finished the installation without any hassle.


Did you make a full driver install and GPU-Z or NVCP shows Physx as installed?

No, I chose not to install the HD Audio driver and nVidia Update.
And, no, I didn't bother to check whether the PhysX software was there
with the GPU-Z, since it wasn't there already while I was installing the 306.23 bundle.
So, as I mentioned previously, I installed the PhysX software direct via the nVidia linked site.

Know what?.. I just did a "test install" of the 306.23 WHQL bundle to see if the PhysX is there.
Beats me, but it was there all right. Thing is, basing on the numbering, it seems like the
PhysX software version I installed separately with the 306.23 bundle is more updated
than what's in the bundle?.. See this:

11727

The PhysX version with the bundle is 9.12.0604, while the version on my G74 now is 9.12.0613.
Any idea which one is better? This I need to find out..

kimiraikkonen
09-15-2012, 01:53 PM
Thanks for detailed reply, Let me express what i found out. My PhysX was v9.12.0213 and was installed bundled with 296.10. Then decided to install 301.42, after installation has finished, what would i see? The PhysX included in 301.42 was the same as included in 296.10, that is v9.12.0213. That's why uninstalling only "Nvidia Display Driver" through Programs and Features along with Driver Sweeper (including Physx registry entries) wiped out existing physx installation before installing 301.42. The surprising part though GPU-Z shows PhysX is missing, BUT i was able to perform red particle benchmark using FluidMark just fine, thus PhysX was actually present. NVCP prooves that. Nvidia 301.42 installer skipped PhysX installation even though i selected it through custom installation, a silly behaviour of NV installer you know.

As per 306.23, Physx v9.12.0604 can be installed, however you somehow seem to have installed "newer" PhysX software "alone" which seems 9.12.613 which is NOT bundled in 306.23. That's another weird behaviour of NV. They must have included v9.12.0613 in the latest WHQL (http://www.nvidia.com/object/physx-9.12.0613-driver.html), that is 306.23. Aren't i right?

Nice to discuss with you mate. Have nice weekend!

PILGRIM
09-15-2012, 02:48 PM
...
As per 306.23, Physx v9.12.0604 can be installed, however you somehow seem to have installed "newer" PhysX software "alone" which seems 9.12.613 which is NOT bundled in 306.23. That's another weird behaviour of NV. They must have included v9.12.0613 in the latest WHQL (http://www.nvidia.com/object/physx-9.12.0613-driver.html), that is 306.23. Aren't i right?

Nice to discuss with you mate. Have nice weekend!

Yeah, and what I found puzzling was that why PhysX v9.12.0604 didn't appear the first time
I installed the 306.23 bundle. Then it "magically" appeared when I already have the v9.12.0613 version.
My question now is that is the v9.12.0604 actually better (since it was bundled with the 306.23 version)?

Have a nice weekend to you, too!..

KRAYGON
09-15-2012, 03:54 PM
8)\

dl'in as i type