Page 18 of 18 FirstFirst ... 8 16 17 18
Results 171 to 180 of 180
  1. #171
    ROG Guru: Brown Belt Array gupsterg PC Specs
    gupsterg PC Specs
    MotherboardAsus Maximus VII Ranger
    Processori5 4690K
    Memory (part number)HyperX Savage 2400MHz 16GB
    Graphics Card #1Sapphire R9 Fury X (1145/545 Custom ROM)
    MonitorAsus MG279Q
    Storage #1Samsung 840 Evo 250GB
    Storage #2HGST 2TB
    CPU CoolerThermalRight Archon SB-E X2
    CaseSilverstone Temjin 06
    Power SupplyCooler Master V850
    Headset/Speakers HyperX Cloud
    OS Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64
    gupsterg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Reputation
    103
    Posts
    1,002

    So I now have a R9 3900X as well and this is a FCLK Clock Edition .

    Initially I set 3800MHz 1:1:1 (FCLK:UCLK:MEMCLK) on the R9 3900X as I would on the R5 3600.

    ProcODT 43.6,
    VDIMM 1.35V
    VTTDDR 0.675V
    SOC 1.062V
    CLDO_VDDP 0.927V
    CLDO_VDDG 0.980V

    This failed Kahru RAM Test 8% . I bumped ProcODT to 48 and failed Kahru RAM Test 80% . Again I bumped ProcODT, went 53 and Kahru RAM Test upto 460% and failed at 607% .

    As the R9 3900X was having a greater load line effect than than the single die R5 3600 & R7 3700X I decided to bump SOC/CLDO_VDDP/CLDO_VDDG a step each and now at ~1313% and counting .

    When I targeted 3800MHz on my R5 3600 I found out which slots on my mobo favored which dimms. This held true also for the R7 3700X, ie same dimms favored same slots, it also seems the R9 3900X is the same also.

    R9 3900X Kahru RAM Test screenie album, link. I'm using the beta 0002 UEFI with Combo-AM4 1.0.04B.
    Intel Defector AMD Rebel

    TR 1950X - Custom WC - Asus Zenith Extreme Alpha - G.Skill Trident Z 3400MHz C14 QC - RX VEGA 64
    R5 3600 - Custom WC - Asus Crosshair VII Hero Wifi - G.Skill Ripjaws V 3800MHz C16 - Sapphire HD 5850 Toxic

    24/7 OC: i5 4690K @ 4.9GHz CPU@1.255v 4.4GHz Cache@1.10v - Archon SB-E X2 - Asus Maximus VII Ranger
    Sapphire Fury X (1145/545 ~17.7K GS 3DM FS)

  2. #172
    New ROGer Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    7

    Great info...thanks!

    What LLC level are you using? What ProcODT value did you end up using for the 1313% run?

    Still haven't ot my 3900X setup yet...life keeps happening

  3. #173
    ROG Guru: Brown Belt Array gupsterg PC Specs
    gupsterg PC Specs
    MotherboardAsus Maximus VII Ranger
    Processori5 4690K
    Memory (part number)HyperX Savage 2400MHz 16GB
    Graphics Card #1Sapphire R9 Fury X (1145/545 Custom ROM)
    MonitorAsus MG279Q
    Storage #1Samsung 840 Evo 250GB
    Storage #2HGST 2TB
    CPU CoolerThermalRight Archon SB-E X2
    CaseSilverstone Temjin 06
    Power SupplyCooler Master V850
    Headset/Speakers HyperX Cloud
    OS Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64
    gupsterg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Reputation
    103
    Posts
    1,002

    Quote Originally Posted by bluestang View Post
    Great info...thanks!

    What LLC level are you using? What ProcODT value did you end up using for the 1313% run?

    Still haven't ot my 3900X setup yet...life keeps happening
    NP, glad you found it useful .

    R9 3900X (Batch code: BF 1944SUT)
    ASUS ROG Crosshair VII Hero Wifi using UEFI 0002 (beta) AGESA 1.0.0.4B
    F4-3200C14Q-32GVK

    UEFI is all defaults except :-

    ProcODT 53.3
    VDIMM 1.35V
    VTTDDR 0.675V
    SOC 1.068V
    CLDO_VDDP 0.930V
    CLDO_VDDG 0.983V

    I always use LLC [Auto] and prefer to bump voltage as needed.

    That ~1313% run I stopped at 4075%, link to youtube screen capture video.

    Now "repeat'n'rinse" testing under way, once I feel the profile has been tested more with HW will post a UEFI settings txt.
    Last edited by gupsterg; 12-12-2019 at 09:40 PM.
    Intel Defector AMD Rebel

    TR 1950X - Custom WC - Asus Zenith Extreme Alpha - G.Skill Trident Z 3400MHz C14 QC - RX VEGA 64
    R5 3600 - Custom WC - Asus Crosshair VII Hero Wifi - G.Skill Ripjaws V 3800MHz C16 - Sapphire HD 5850 Toxic

    24/7 OC: i5 4690K @ 4.9GHz CPU@1.255v 4.4GHz Cache@1.10v - Archon SB-E X2 - Asus Maximus VII Ranger
    Sapphire Fury X (1145/545 ~17.7K GS 3DM FS)

  4. #174
    ROG Guru: Brown Belt Array gupsterg PC Specs
    gupsterg PC Specs
    MotherboardAsus Maximus VII Ranger
    Processori5 4690K
    Memory (part number)HyperX Savage 2400MHz 16GB
    Graphics Card #1Sapphire R9 Fury X (1145/545 Custom ROM)
    MonitorAsus MG279Q
    Storage #1Samsung 840 Evo 250GB
    Storage #2HGST 2TB
    CPU CoolerThermalRight Archon SB-E X2
    CaseSilverstone Temjin 06
    Power SupplyCooler Master V850
    Headset/Speakers HyperX Cloud
    OS Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64
    gupsterg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Reputation
    103
    Posts
    1,002

    Gotta find the time to update OP, just been so snowed.

    On another forum some one had wondered about the new effective clocks in HWINFO, see this post by author.

    Also there seems to be a new block on the market which may interest Matisse owners, link.

    *** edit ***

    Really am liking this CPU sample. Some nice boost clocks at stock, really just thinking of testing the FCLK/MEMCLK OC and calling it a day.

    This album has:-

    i) HWINFO/Ryzen Master screenie to see which cores are being highlighted as best.

    ii) 3x AIDA64 on 3800MHz C16.

    iii) temps/boost of CPU at stock when CB20 multi run, room ambient 18C at the time.

    iv) CB20 single/multi, first of the day run, room ambient 16C, CPU stock RAM/FCLK 3800MHz.

    v) Another CB20 run later in the day after having done some stability testing, so some what warm rig, room ambient 18C.

    vi) Running a SFC scan, not that having an issue, just wanted to see boosting and it's nice .

    Still doing more testing, profile has shaped up nicely IMO and will soon share settings txt .
    Last edited by gupsterg; 12-13-2019 at 06:23 PM.
    Intel Defector AMD Rebel

    TR 1950X - Custom WC - Asus Zenith Extreme Alpha - G.Skill Trident Z 3400MHz C14 QC - RX VEGA 64
    R5 3600 - Custom WC - Asus Crosshair VII Hero Wifi - G.Skill Ripjaws V 3800MHz C16 - Sapphire HD 5850 Toxic

    24/7 OC: i5 4690K @ 4.9GHz CPU@1.255v 4.4GHz Cache@1.10v - Archon SB-E X2 - Asus Maximus VII Ranger
    Sapphire Fury X (1145/545 ~17.7K GS 3DM FS)

  5. #175
    ROG Guru: Brown Belt Array gupsterg PC Specs
    gupsterg PC Specs
    MotherboardAsus Maximus VII Ranger
    Processori5 4690K
    Memory (part number)HyperX Savage 2400MHz 16GB
    Graphics Card #1Sapphire R9 Fury X (1145/545 Custom ROM)
    MonitorAsus MG279Q
    Storage #1Samsung 840 Evo 250GB
    Storage #2HGST 2TB
    CPU CoolerThermalRight Archon SB-E X2
    CaseSilverstone Temjin 06
    Power SupplyCooler Master V850
    Headset/Speakers HyperX Cloud
    OS Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64
    gupsterg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Reputation
    103
    Posts
    1,002

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191214_215545.jpg 
Views:	0 
Size:	439.3 KB 
ID:	83446

    The triple showdown has begun ...

    All CPUs are batch BF 1944SUT, all have UG stamped on IHS ...

    As I felt the first had been tested enough for 3800MHz 1:1:1, I moved on to the second, at stock the 2nd is ~100 points higher in CB20 (~7323 points multi), let's see if it's also a FCLK edition ...
    Last edited by gupsterg; 12-14-2019 at 10:46 PM.
    Intel Defector AMD Rebel

    TR 1950X - Custom WC - Asus Zenith Extreme Alpha - G.Skill Trident Z 3400MHz C14 QC - RX VEGA 64
    R5 3600 - Custom WC - Asus Crosshair VII Hero Wifi - G.Skill Ripjaws V 3800MHz C16 - Sapphire HD 5850 Toxic

    24/7 OC: i5 4690K @ 4.9GHz CPU@1.255v 4.4GHz Cache@1.10v - Archon SB-E X2 - Asus Maximus VII Ranger
    Sapphire Fury X (1145/545 ~17.7K GS 3DM FS)

  6. #176
    ROG Guru: Brown Belt Array gupsterg PC Specs
    gupsterg PC Specs
    MotherboardAsus Maximus VII Ranger
    Processori5 4690K
    Memory (part number)HyperX Savage 2400MHz 16GB
    Graphics Card #1Sapphire R9 Fury X (1145/545 Custom ROM)
    MonitorAsus MG279Q
    Storage #1Samsung 840 Evo 250GB
    Storage #2HGST 2TB
    CPU CoolerThermalRight Archon SB-E X2
    CaseSilverstone Temjin 06
    Power SupplyCooler Master V850
    Headset/Speakers HyperX Cloud
    OS Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64
    gupsterg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Reputation
    103
    Posts
    1,002

    My 2nd/3rd samples of R9 3900X I have dubbed MHz Editions .

    These responds to PBO [Enabled] better than FCLK Edition not yet tried +xxxMHz . It also seems the cores are more similar so better for all cores OC .

    This ZIP contains stock CPU Statuscore loading each thread with Ryzen Master compare.

    2nd/3rd R9 3900X seems to have better multicore boost, not only when checked for clocks but benches. For example for multicore in Realbench stress mode 32GB 30min run 1st is ~4.0GHz all cores average effective MHz, 2nd is ~4.1GHz. When loading with P95 8K 4096K 27GB, 1st is ~4.025GHz all cores average effective MHz, 2nd is ~4.075GHz.

    They all seem a little differing on ProcODT for RAM MHz.

    Code:
            R9_1    R9_2    R9_3
    
    CCD0
    
    C01    4551    4546    4545
    C02    4515    4517    4524
    C03    4555    4484    4452
    C04    4543    4542    4547
    C05    4515    4479    4517
    C06    4549    4463    4470
    
    CCD1
    
    C07    4369    4421    4407
    C08    4313    4373    4406
    C09    4307    4365    4370
    C10    4323    4346    4389
    C11    4346    4395    4354
    C12    4371    4341    4348
    Only 1 of the R9 3900X does FCLK 1900MHz, MAX FCLK it can do is ~1903.5MHz.

    One of the R9 3900X is shy of FCLK 1900MHz by ~8MHz, this one can do 4x8GB at 3733MHz.

    One of the R9 3900X is shy of FCLK 1900MHz by ~4MHz, this one though the IMC seems pants, as I've yet to gain even 3733MHz MEMCLK on 4x8GB.
    Intel Defector AMD Rebel

    TR 1950X - Custom WC - Asus Zenith Extreme Alpha - G.Skill Trident Z 3400MHz C14 QC - RX VEGA 64
    R5 3600 - Custom WC - Asus Crosshair VII Hero Wifi - G.Skill Ripjaws V 3800MHz C16 - Sapphire HD 5850 Toxic

    24/7 OC: i5 4690K @ 4.9GHz CPU@1.255v 4.4GHz Cache@1.10v - Archon SB-E X2 - Asus Maximus VII Ranger
    Sapphire Fury X (1145/545 ~17.7K GS 3DM FS)

  7. #177
    ROG Guru: White Belt Array bigtop1967 PC Specs
    bigtop1967 PC Specs
    MotherboardCrosshair VII Hero
    ProcessorRyzen 3900X
    Memory (part number)Patriot Steel 4400CL19 @ 3733CL16
    Graphics Card #1XFX Radeon RX 580 8GB Black Edition
    Monitor2 x Acer CB241HQK
    Storage #1ADATA SX8200NP 480GB
    Storage #22 x SanDisk Ultra II
    CPU CoolerFractal Design S36 AIO
    CaseThermaltake Green Riing Core X5 EATX PC Gaming Cube
    Power SupplyEVGA G3 Gold
    Keyboard CORSAIR K70 RGB MK.2 Mechanical Gaming Keyboard Cherry mx brown
    Mouse Microsoft Mobile Wireless 4000
    OS Windows 10 Pro
    Network RouterASUS
    bigtop1967's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Reputation
    11
    Posts
    101

    Quote Originally Posted by gupsterg View Post
    My 2nd/3rd samples of R9 3900X I have dubbed MHz Editions .

    These responds to PBO [Enabled] better than FCLK Edition not yet tried +xxxMHz . It also seems the cores are more similar so better for all cores OC .

    This ZIP contains stock CPU Statuscore loading each thread with Ryzen Master compare.

    2nd/3rd R9 3900X seems to have better multicore boost, not only when checked for clocks but benches. For example for multicore in Realbench stress mode 32GB 30min run 1st is ~4.0GHz all cores average effective MHz, 2nd is ~4.1GHz. When loading with P95 8K 4096K 27GB, 1st is ~4.025GHz all cores average effective MHz, 2nd is ~4.075GHz.

    They all seem a little differing on ProcODT for RAM MHz.

    Code:
            R9_1    R9_2    R9_3
    
    CCD0
    
    C01    4551    4546    4545
    C02    4515    4517    4524
    C03    4555    4484    4452
    C04    4543    4542    4547
    C05    4515    4479    4517
    C06    4549    4463    4470
    
    CCD1
    
    C07    4369    4421    4407
    C08    4313    4373    4406
    C09    4307    4365    4370
    C10    4323    4346    4389
    C11    4346    4395    4354
    C12    4371    4341    4348
    Only 1 of the R9 3900X does FCLK 1900MHz, MAX FCLK it can do is ~1903.5MHz.

    One of the R9 3900X is shy of FCLK 1900MHz by ~8MHz, this one can do 4x8GB at 3733MHz.

    One of the R9 3900X is shy of FCLK 1900MHz by ~4MHz, this one though the IMC seems pants, as I've yet to gain even 3733MHz MEMCLK on 4x8GB.
    Very interesting - thanks for posting. My 3900x seems to have pants FCLK though haven't tested as thoroughly as you. I did do some BCLK tests which got me nearer to 1900 FCLK, but not done much more since. Been waiting for the 1004 AGESA but they really are taking a long time to release it for the CH7.

    I've been wondering if I should try RMA - but even if they accepted it, it looks like i will prob get a CPU of very similar performance.

    Have you tested if these 2nd and 3rd gen CPUs are using less power like the 3950x? If that were true, I'd definitely RMA!
    About me: I am dyslexic and DO occasionally miss things!

    There are 10 types of people, those who understand binary, and those that don't.
    F people in 10 don't understand hexadecimal[/SIZE]

  8. #178
    ROG Guru: Brown Belt Array gupsterg PC Specs
    gupsterg PC Specs
    MotherboardAsus Maximus VII Ranger
    Processori5 4690K
    Memory (part number)HyperX Savage 2400MHz 16GB
    Graphics Card #1Sapphire R9 Fury X (1145/545 Custom ROM)
    MonitorAsus MG279Q
    Storage #1Samsung 840 Evo 250GB
    Storage #2HGST 2TB
    CPU CoolerThermalRight Archon SB-E X2
    CaseSilverstone Temjin 06
    Power SupplyCooler Master V850
    Headset/Speakers HyperX Cloud
    OS Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64
    gupsterg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Reputation
    103
    Posts
    1,002

    NP .

    I wouldn't RMA just as you're CPU doesn't do FCLK 1900MHz, you could end up with slightly worse CPU on aspects I have noted between mine.

    All the R9 3900X I have, are same production batch, BF 1944SUT with UG stamp on IHS. 2 of the CPUs are even close serial, but differ from each other in aspects.

    First and foremost core MHz is king. Sample 2 under PBO edges past sample 3, ~25 to 50MHz averaged all cores boost. Sample 1 which does FCLK:UCLK/MEMCLK 1900MHz is behind them both by ~50-100MHz on average all cores MHz.

    Secondly I've noted the delta between CCDs temperature can be larger on sample 3 compared with 1 & 2. Averaged each CCD temps difference is ~7C on sample 3 vs 2C on sample 1 & 2.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RT PBOE compare of 0032 0339 0058.jpg 
Views:	0 
Size:	414.4 KB 
ID:	83506

    I shared before just each thread MHz for Statuscore per CPU, this ZIP has test loading each thread in sequence. I pitted sample 1 at stock vs sample 3 with PBOE, as sample 1 does not respond to PBOE I felt I wanted to compare best of each. You'll see From 1-12 sample 1 as having the better CCD0 is higher MHz, sample 3 then starts besting it as cores 13-24 are loaded. As both CCDs come into play I believe then the weaker CCD in away affects boosting that stronger CCD can't perform as good as it may.

    After you digest that last test, next metric I believe to determine how good a CPU is, is how the cores for performance are ordered. Below left to right is sample 1, 2 & 3.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CPO compare of 0032 0339 0058.jpg 
Views:	0 
Size:	329.1 KB 
ID:	83507

    In HWINFO perf # first number is how SMU is categorizing core performance order. Sample 3 is best on that fact if an OS is not CPPC aware IMO, sample 2 is next best and lastly sample 1 (ie one which does FCLK 1900MHz).

    The binning is tight regardless of these aspects. The best CB20 result I have so far is on sample 2, as I don't use all cores OC metric is either CPU stock or PBO if it responds to it.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PBOE CB20 531 7493 run 1 2 3 multi same room 14C.jpg 
Views:	0 
Size:	591.6 KB 
ID:	83508

    Sample 2 & 3 are more consistent for run to run variance in a bench, as sample 1 has bigger core to core MHz difference it seems to differ more run to run, context multicore runs, single core all are the same ~529-531.
    Last edited by gupsterg; 12-18-2019 at 09:59 AM.
    Intel Defector AMD Rebel

    TR 1950X - Custom WC - Asus Zenith Extreme Alpha - G.Skill Trident Z 3400MHz C14 QC - RX VEGA 64
    R5 3600 - Custom WC - Asus Crosshair VII Hero Wifi - G.Skill Ripjaws V 3800MHz C16 - Sapphire HD 5850 Toxic

    24/7 OC: i5 4690K @ 4.9GHz CPU@1.255v 4.4GHz Cache@1.10v - Archon SB-E X2 - Asus Maximus VII Ranger
    Sapphire Fury X (1145/545 ~17.7K GS 3DM FS)

  9. #179
    ROG Guru: White Belt Array bigtop1967 PC Specs
    bigtop1967 PC Specs
    MotherboardCrosshair VII Hero
    ProcessorRyzen 3900X
    Memory (part number)Patriot Steel 4400CL19 @ 3733CL16
    Graphics Card #1XFX Radeon RX 580 8GB Black Edition
    Monitor2 x Acer CB241HQK
    Storage #1ADATA SX8200NP 480GB
    Storage #22 x SanDisk Ultra II
    CPU CoolerFractal Design S36 AIO
    CaseThermaltake Green Riing Core X5 EATX PC Gaming Cube
    Power SupplyEVGA G3 Gold
    Keyboard CORSAIR K70 RGB MK.2 Mechanical Gaming Keyboard Cherry mx brown
    Mouse Microsoft Mobile Wireless 4000
    OS Windows 10 Pro
    Network RouterASUS
    bigtop1967's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Reputation
    11
    Posts
    101

    Quote Originally Posted by gupsterg View Post
    NP .

    I wouldn't RMA just as you're CPU doesn't do FCLK 1900MHz, you could end up with slightly worse CPU on aspects I have noted between mine.

    All the R9 3900X I have, are same production batch, BF 1944SUT with UG stamp on IHS. 2 of the CPUs are even close serial, but differ from each other in aspects.

    First and foremost core MHz is king. Sample 2 under PBO edges past sample 3, ~25 to 50MHz averaged all cores boost. Sample 1 which does FCLK:UCLK/MEMCLK 1900MHz is behind them both by ~50-100MHz on average all cores MHz.

    Secondly I've noted the delta between CCDs temperature can be larger on sample 3 compared with 1 & 2. Averaged each CCD temps difference is ~7C on sample 3 vs 2C on sample 1 & 2.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RT PBOE compare of 0032 0339 0058.jpg 
Views:	0 
Size:	414.4 KB 
ID:	83506

    I shared before just each thread MHz for Statuscore per CPU, this ZIP has test loading each thread in sequence. I pitted sample 1 at stock vs sample 3 with PBOE, as sample 1 does not respond to PBOE I felt I wanted to compare best of each. You'll see From 1-12 sample 1 as having the better CCD0 is higher MHz, sample 3 then starts besting it as cores 13-24 are loaded. As both CCDs come into play I believe then the weaker CCD in away affects boosting that stronger CCD can't perform as good as it may.

    After you digest that last test, next metric I believe to determine how good a CPU is, is how the cores for performance are ordered. Below left to right is sample 1, 2 & 3.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CPO compare of 0032 0339 0058.jpg 
Views:	0 
Size:	329.1 KB 
ID:	83507

    In HWINFO perf # first number is how SMU is categorizing core performance order. Sample 3 is best on that fact if an OS is not CPPC aware IMO, sample 2 is next best and lastly sample 1 (ie one which does FCLK 1900MHz).

    The binning is tight regardless of these aspects. The best CB20 result I have so far is on sample 2, as I don't use all cores OC metric is either CPU stock or PBO if it responds to it.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PBOE CB20 531 7493 run 1 2 3 multi same room 14C.jpg 
Views:	0 
Size:	591.6 KB 
ID:	83508

    Sample 2 & 3 are more consistent for run to run variance in a bench, as sample 1 has bigger core to core MHz difference it seems to differ more run to run, context multicore runs, single core all are the same ~529-531.
    Exactly my thoughts - thanks for the extra data!

    I have found while comparing my performance with others that I often beat those with 1900 FCLK anyway, indicating that some are pushing further than is beneficial..... Though of course we all want 1900 FCLK
    About me: I am dyslexic and DO occasionally miss things!

    There are 10 types of people, those who understand binary, and those that don't.
    F people in 10 don't understand hexadecimal[/SIZE]

  10. #180
    New ROGer Array Riverdog64 PC Specs
    Riverdog64 PC Specs
    MotherboardASUS ROG Crosshair VII Hero (Wi-Fi) X470
    ProcessorAMD Ryzen 7 2700X
    Memory (part number)CORSAIR VENGEANCEL 16GB (2X 8GB) DDR4 3600
    Graphics Card #1GIGABYTE Radeon VII 16GB PCI Express
    Sound Cardon-board
    MonitorASUS ROG Swift PG278QR 27” Gaming Monitor 1440p 1ms 165Hz DP HDMI G-SYNC
    Storage #1Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB - NVMe M.2
    Storage #2Seagate BarraCuda 2TB HDD – 3.5 Inch SATA 6Gb/s
    CPU CoolerFractal Design Cooler FD-WCU-CELSIUS-S24
    CaseCORSAIR Carbide 270R Mid-Tower Case, Window Side Panel
    Power SupplyCORSAIR RM750x, 750 Watt, 80+ Gold
    Keyboard Redragon K582-BA Wired Mechanical Gaming Keyboard
    Mouse Redragon Cobra Gaming Mouse Combo, 10,000DPI
    Mouse Pad who cares?

    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    2

    UEFI/BIOS Overclock presets

    I have the Crosshair Vii X-470 w/ Ryzen 7, Radeon 7. Used mostly for gaming, I was curious about the overclock presets in the bios. Most of you all are well beyond using such basic stuff, but for a newbie are they a safe way to start overclocking my system?

Page 18 of 18 FirstFirst ... 8 16 17 18

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •