08-06-2018 10:09 PM - last edited on 03-06-2024 08:17 PM by ROGBot
08-07-2018 02:17 AM
08-10-2018 12:01 PM
Silent Scone wrote:
You don't want to be straying too far from 1.35v as an imposed limit on VCCIO and SA for daily use.
08-10-2018 12:47 PM
08-10-2018 10:38 PM
Silent Scone wrote:
For that frequency, some CPU likely need that much voltage. Although you may be able to get the system stable with less. 1-2000% coverage is enough, call it stable and use the system. After a few days, perhaps attempt to lower the voltages and retest. At those frequencies, you might be losing some performance anyway due to the sub timings.
08-10-2018 10:52 PM
kaptanedi wrote:
Thanks for the answers. you think performance is slow at these speeds. I understand. That's all I can do.
08-10-2018 12:46 PM
08-10-2018 12:50 PM
08-10-2018 10:41 PM
Korth wrote:
"Safe" parameters are Intel's rated specs, technically speaking, anything else is overspec (overclock) and "unsafe" if your focus is rated reliability/longevity.
But you should be able to "safely" exceed 1.35V on an APEX (with good PSU and cooling). I'm always reluctant to increment voltages unless doing so increases stability without turning my machines into furnaces, I get kinda timid and throttle clocks back down at >1.37V haha (I want my stuff to be reliable and to last a while, I don't care as much about pushing unsustainable high scores).
Overlocked settings which are "safe" and work perfectly today might fail tomorrow (or next year, or never), it's the nature of the beast.