Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: X470-I AVX Offset?
-
08-27-2018 01:53 AM #1
X470-I AVX Offset?
Please forgive my ignorance. I haven't owned anything AMD since the original Athlon.
Is there an AVX/AVX2 offset in the bios for this motherboard? I want to transcode DVDs using Handbrake on a 2600X and this thing gets really hot doing that specific task.
Thanks in advance!
-
08-27-2018 02:13 AM #2
-
08-27-2018 10:32 PM #3
That's actually unfortunate.
The heat from transcoding video is too intense for the cooler that it comes with. Did they expect people wouldn't use it for more than browsing or gaming?
-
08-27-2018 11:11 PM #4
Intel owns the patent, so unless AMD comes up with a way around it, don’t expect it.
-
08-27-2018 11:33 PM #5
Korth PC Specs Motherboard ASUS X99 R5E (BIOS2101/1902) Processor Haswell-EP E5-1680-3 SR20H/R2 (4.4GHz) Memory (part number) Vengeance LPX 4x8GB SS DDR4-3000 (CMK32GX4M4C3000C15) Graphics Card #1 NVIDIA Quadro GP100GL/16GB, 16xPCIe3, NVLink1 (SLI-HB) Graphics Card #2 NVIDIA Quadro GP100GL/16GB, 16xPCIe3, NVLink1 (SLI-HB) Sound Card JDS Labs O2+ODAC (RevB), USB2 UAC1 Monitor ASUS PG278Q Storage #1 Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSDs, 4xSATA3 RAID0 Storage #2 Comay BladeDrive E28 3200GB SSD, 8xPCIe2 CPU Cooler Raijintek NEMESIS/TISIS, AS5, 2xNH-A14 Case Obsidian 750D (original), 6xNH-A14 Power Supply Zalman/FSP ZM1250 Platinum Headset Pilot P51 PTT *modded* OS Arch, Gentoo, Win7x64, Win10x64 Network Router Actiontec T3200M VDSL2 Gateway Accessory #1 TP-Link AC1900 Archer T9E, 1xPCIe Accessory #2 ASUS/Infineon SLB9635 TPM (TT1.2/FW3.19) Accessory #3 ASUS OC Panel I (FW0501)
- Join Date
- Mar 2015
- Reputation
- 152
- Posts
- 2,718
AVX seems to be consistently slower than SSE4 on AMD parts anyhow, outside of very few special-niche code extremes which synthetically maximize AVX advantages. AVX has been very broken and buggy and patchy since at least the Haswell-E era, as it stands it's not really all that it should be or anything at all like what Intel says it should be.
I think mostly because AVX (especially AVX-512) requires a lot of fine tuning and optimizations to obtain full performance benefits. Fine tuning performance optimizations which, incidentally, Intel claims will be implemented by the non-Intel hardware OEMs and software devs."All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others." - Douglas Adams
[/Korth]
-
08-28-2018 05:50 AM #6
I'd imagine the need is far less great on AMD parts due to the fact vectors are split, not only does this likely have some kind of impact on performance but power draw too.
-
08-30-2018 10:17 AM #7
Could I get some advice from you wonderful people on what my settings should be then?