DX12 Time Spy Benchmark Thread

[Rob W.]

chiller sat under desk waiting patiently for me to test to the max on water only, now I know! so lets see what it does on the chiller?

[jpmboy]

The standard test is more indicative of GPU score than CPU score overal. Look at my 7900X compared with most of the XE in the top 10. Extreme CPU test is far more multi thread intensive. GT 1 and 2 are certainly not CPU limited, either

... nah.

lol - But sure, overall score weighs physics quite a bit. More threads with the same gpu drives the overall ( via physics score), but with the same cpu and gpu, lower rez is basically a cpu benchmark, in all these benches, FM, Unigine, SquareE... etc. Thread use during the GT portions is not 36 with the XE (this I know) and I'd be surprised if it maxes out the 7900X's 20 threads during the graphics tests in the lower rez settings. 2 or 4 threads depending on the core priority last I looked. If ya just look at the graphics scores - even this, within the same GPU class ranks with cpu frequency (barring LN2 on the GPUs). Lot's of data in the OCN Time Spy threads - actually more than in the HOF since only has the top 100.

Anyway, I find FS Ultra and the 8K tests in Superposition really level the field to the GPU performance... until we have a good ray trace benchmark.

I'm still surprised that the 2080Ti is not just crushing the Titan V. I really hope a Turing Titan is launched (with SLI capabilities - please).

[Silent Scone@ROG]

... nah.

lol - But sure, overall score weighs physics quite a bit. More threads with the same gpu drives the overall ( via physics score), but with the same cpu and gpu, lower rez is basically a cpu benchmark, in all these benches, FM, Unigine, SquareE... etc. Thread use during the GT portions is not 36 with the XE (this I know) and I'd be surprised if it maxes out the 7900X's 20 threads during the graphics tests in the lower rez settings. 2 or 4 threads depending on the core priority last I looked. If ya just look at the graphics scores - even this, within the same GPU class ranks with cpu frequency (barring LN2 on the GPUs). Lot's of data in the OCN Time Spy threads - actually more than in the HOF since only has the top 100.

Anyway, I find FS Ultra and the 8K tests in Superposition really level the field to the GPU performance... until we have a good ray trace benchmark.

I'm still surprised that the 2080Ti is not just crushing the Titan V. I really hope a Turing Titan is launched (with SLI capabilities - please).

Strange how the HOF isn't dominated by 8700K, in that case. FS Ultra is good if you're strictly testing DX11 performance.

Don't forget GV100 is a massively powerful GPU. I guess from NVIDIA's point of view, it makes Turing look appealing at the price point lol. https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/4574376/spy/3355469

[Nate152]

Here's my score, I used Nvidia driver 399.24

i7-7700k - 5.2GHz

Titan Xp: Core - 2038MHz Memory - 12,994MHz

16GB Kingston HyperX Predator 3000MHz 15-15-15-35-1T

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/29050883

[Silent Scone@ROG]

Here's my score, I used Nvidia driver 399.24

i7-7700k - 5.2GHz

Titan Xp: Core - 2038MHz Memory - 12,994MHz

16GB Kingston HyperX Predator 3000MHz 15-15-15-35-1T

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/29050883

Thanks, Nate.

chiller sat under desk waiting patiently for me to test to the max on water only, now I know! so lets see what it does on the chiller?

JP has run the Titan V on a water chiller, so his higher runs will give you a good indication.

[jpmboy]

<strong>Strange how the HOF isn't dominated by 8700K</strong>, in that case. FS Ultra is good if you're strictly testing DX11 performance.

Don't forget GV100 is a massively powerful GPU. I guess from NVIDIA's point of view, it makes Turing look appealing at the price point lol. <a href="https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/4574376/spy/3355469" target="_blank">https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/4574376/spy/3355469</a>

yep,
that's my point - the physics score weighs too heavily. I usually check the graphics score HOF for GPU contribution (see the pic attached). But either way bro, it seems the 2080Ti is performing as NV expected - killin the GPU scoreboard! Good you snagged two. I cancelled my preorder, wrongly influenced by prelims on the RTX6000.
That said, I may grab a couple if stock ever returns... IDK, in my business launch a product and can't make stock = trashed company stock even if it is one of a 1000 products you sell.

[jpmboy]

jpmboy --- 8086K@5.2 --- GTX 1070Ti@2100/2249 --- 8465
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/4578290

[Silent Scone@ROG]

yep,
that's my point - the physics score weighs too heavily. I usually check the graphics score HOF for GPU contribution (see the pic attached). But either way bro, it seems the 2080Ti is performing as NV expected - killin the GPU scoreboard! Good you snagged two. I cancelled my preorder, wrongly influenced by prelims on the RTX6000.
That said, I may grab a couple if stock ever returns... IDK, in my business launch a product and can't make stock = trashed company stock even if it is one of a 1000 products you sell.

Prelim leaks on the 2080Ti were vastly based on cards that were heavily power limited, the difference can be staggering depending on the game/benchmark. Hoping the second card does a bit more in the frequency department!

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
Little bump still not my best
Best is 10498
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/28066409

ThrashZone----10480----5930k @ 4.6GHz----1080ti FTW3 @ 2050MHz/ 1621MHz----3200Mhz----14-14-14-34-1T
Time Spy Standard
Driver 397.64
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/29113773

[Rob W.]

My latest score.
Time spy standard.
I9-7980@4.8ghz, *Titan V, gskill 3600mhzs *15 15 15 34 2t
Driver 411.70
**