Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: Aquantia vs Intel port
-
Yesterday 01:43 PM #1ROG Guru: Brown Belt Array tistou77 PC Specs
tistou77 PC Specs Motherboard Rampage VI Extreme Encore Processor 10980XE @4.6Ghz Memory (part number) G.Skill Trident Z RGB Royal 4x8Gb @4000 C16 Graphics Card #1 EVGA RTX 2080ti XC Ultra Sound Card Xonar Phoebus Monitor Dell U2721DE Storage #1 Intel Optane 905P PCIe Storage #2 Samsung 980 Pro CPU Cooler Watercooling Case Lian Li A77F Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Titanium 1000W Keyboard Logitech LIK Mouse Logitech MX revolution OS Windows 10 Pro x64
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Reputation
- 128
- Posts
- 1,662
Aquantia vs Intel port
Hello
I switched to fiber (1gb/s on the RJ45 port of the box), is it worth using the Aquantia RJ45 port rather than the Intel (other than the speed aspect) ?
Currently I have this
ThanksSorry for my english
Case: Lian Li A77F
MB: Rampage VI Extreme Encore
CPU: i9 10980XE
RAM: G.Skill Trident Z RGB Royal 4x8Gb @4000 C16
GPU: EVGA RTX 2080ti XC Ultra
PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Titanium 1000W
OS: Intel Optane 905P PCIe
DATA: Samsung 980 Pro
SOUND: Asus Xonar Phoebus
-
Yesterday 08:32 PM #2New ROGer Array Murph_9000 PC Specs
Murph_9000 PC Specs Motherboard ROG Crosshair VIII Extreme Processor AMD Ryzen 5950X Memory (part number) Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3600 CL16 Graphics Card #1 ROG Strix Radeon RX 6750 XT Monitor ROG Strix XG43UQ Storage #1 Seagate FireCuda 530 CPU Cooler ROG Ryujin II 360 Case ROG Strix Helios Power Supply ROG Thor 1200W Platinum Keyboard ROG Strix Scope RX, ROG Claymore II Mouse ROG Keris Wireless Headset ROG Delta S Mouse Pad ROG Scabbard II OS Windows 11 Network Router ROG Rapture GT-AX6000
- Join Date
- May 2022
- Reputation
- 10
- Posts
- 6
With the link running at 1000 base T on both, it shouldn't really matter much. There might be a very marginal benefit from one over the other, if one gives you something like TCP segmentation offload (part of TCP handled in hardware, rather than by the OS), and the other doesn't. On a HEDT platform, it shouldn't really matter much unless you have heavy CPU or network saturation, because you have plenty of high power cores available to just deal with the network in the OS.
That's assuming it's running well as-is. If you're reliably getting close to full bandwidth, without any glitchy behaviour, it's probably just fine. If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Chasing the last few % of network performance can be a lot of effort, if you don't have a specific problem/need.
-
Today 02:25 AM #3ROG Guru: Blue Belt Array restsugavan PC Specs
restsugavan PC Specs Motherboard RAMPAGE VI EXTREME BIOS 3701 MOD Processor Intel Core i9 7980XE 2.60GHz Memory (part number) 64GB GSKILL 3.2 GHz 16-16-18-36 2T Graphics Card #1 ASUS ROG POSEIDON 1080Ti Monitor SAMSUNG ODESSEY G9 NEO 49 Firmware 1005.1 Storage #1 SAMSUNG 970 EVO PLUS 1TB x 3 Storage #2 WD 4TB External HDD CPU Cooler NZXT KRAKEN 62 Case Corsair Carbine 540 Power Supply Corsair AX1200i Keyboard Microsoft Mouse Microsoft Mouse Pad ASUS Headset/Speakers Sony OS Windows 11 Insider Preview 25151.1000 Network Router D-LINK 
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Reputation
- 130
- Posts
- 779
Intel i219 V port perform better
Intel i219 V port perform better than Marvell 10G port.
My local ISP service 1000 mbps / 300 mbps speed.
https://www.speedtest.net/result/13346830440Last edited by restsugavan; Today at 02:29 AM.
Windows 11 22H2 Build 25151.1000 Core i9 7980XE 02006D05 MCU 2021-11-13 R6E 3701 MODDED BIOS TPM 2.0 Enabled VROC 7.7.0.1054 + RST 18.31.3.5434 ME FW 11.12.92.2222 DV 2211.2.3.0 64GB DDR4 3200 XMP POSEIDON 1080i GTX NVIDIA Driver 525.14 WHQL 3TB SAMSUNG 970 EVO PLUS OMS Driver 18.37.0.1003 WHQL i219 V OROM 0.1.02 BA 0.1.16 12.19.2.45 WHQL AQC 107N FW 3.1.121 AQC 3.1.6.0 WHQL Realtek HD 6.0.9360.1 WHQL SAMSUNG ODYSSEY G9 49 NEO FW 1008 VESA HDR 2000 DP 
Reply With Quote