03-28-2019 01:36 PM - last edited on 03-06-2024 08:27 PM by ROGBot
03-29-2019 01:20 AM
cniedzi wrote:
Hi,
I've bought new G.Skill Trident Z, DDR4, 32 GB (4x8GB),3600MHz, CL16 (F4-3600C16Q-32GTZKK) and I try to run it with i9-9900K on Asus Maximus XI Hero. This RAM isn't on ASUS QVL but it is on G.Skill QVL.
The i9-9900k is not overclocked (standard Turbo mode active) and XMP I profile is set (3600 MHz, CL16-16-16-36 2T @1.35V). Other BIOS things are set of Auto. I've successfuly passed these tests:
- 8 hrs of ROG RealBench v2.43
- Karhu RAM test 1.1.0.0 - coverage of 12600%.
But, I have a problem. When decompressing 13GB RAR file (Winrar 64bit, 7z, etc.) I got errors stating archive is corrupted (archive consistency confirmed on other computer). Strange thing is the problem is when RAR file is on HDD. If I copy this file to SDD and try to decompress it from SDD everything goes ok. I've tried WinRAR decompressing on brand new HDD -> WinRAR failed (there isn't HDD issue therefore).
So, I've done some additional tests:
- only 2 sticks in A2 and B2 slots (16GB @XMP I) - WinRAR passed
- only another 2 sticks in A1 and B1 slots (16GB @XMP I) - WinRAR passed
- 4 sticks (32GB but @3200 MHz) - WinRAR passed.
- 4 sicks >3200 MHz - WinRAR failed.
I've tried to raise DRAM voltage to 1.4V, but WinRAR failed on HDD.
PS. Generaly small RAR files (ca. 2-3GB) are decompressed normally.
May I asked more experienced ROG users to guide me to achive XMP 3600 MHz. Or maybe I should RMA this RAM.
Please help.
03-29-2019 01:00 PM
Silent Scone@ASUS wrote:
With that much Ramtest coverage, the memory shouldn't have any issues with decompression. Have you tried running Karhu again since the issue arose? Sounds like there's possibly some memory training discrepancy.
Set VCCSA and VCCIO voltages to 1.2v - 1.25v.
03-29-2019 02:48 AM
03-29-2019 02:04 PM
03-29-2019 02:14 PM
Silent Scone@ASUS wrote:
Hard to say sitting from here, but memory rules change from build to build occasionally. If the memory kit is more stable on the previous UEFI, then there's little reason to change unless one is happy to tune things manually.
04-01-2019 04:39 PM
Silent Scone@ASUS wrote:
Hard to say sitting from here, but memory rules change from build to build occasionally. If the memory kit is more stable on the previous UEFI, then there's little reason to change unless one is happy to tune things manually.
04-03-2019 12:18 AM
04-03-2019 05:31 AM
cniedzi wrote:
Ok, RAM has been returned. Waiting for new F4-3866C18Q-32GTZR. Will see.
04-03-2019 05:43 AM
Phillyflyer wrote:
You should have no issues with the 3866mhz quad kit...I have used it on 4 different boards .