Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    ROG Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    22

    How come CPU Current Capability went from 170% to 140% on Z390-I 2417 Bios update?

    I just updated bios today on the Z390-I mobo, and I noticed CPU Current Capability maxes out at 140% instead of 170%? How come, and how much will this affect my overclock?


    Pic for reference:

    https://imgur.com/a/rp1I85w

  2. #2
    ROG Guru: Yellow Belt Array Deepcuts PC Specs
    Deepcuts PC Specs
    MotherboardAsus Maximus X HERO BIOS 1901
    ProcessorIntel i7 8700K @ 4.7Ghz 1.215V
    Memory (part number)CMR32GX4M4C3466C16 @ 3200Mhz 1.360V
    Graphics Card #1Asus Strix GTX 1080Ti OC 11GB
    Sound CardCreative Omni 5.1 USB
    MonitorDell 24' S2417DG
    Storage #1Samsung EVO 960 nvme 500 GB
    Storage #2Seagate NAS 8TBx2
    CPU CoolerNZXT Kraken X62
    CaseFractal Design Define R5 Black
    Power SupplyCorsair AXi760
    Keyboard Razer DeathStalker Chroma
    Mouse Razer Abyssus
    OS Windows 10
    Network RouterMikrotik

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Reputation
    13
    Posts
    244

    Quote Originally Posted by tml4191 View Post
    I just updated bios today on the Z390-I mobo, and I noticed CPU Current Capability maxes out at 140% instead of 170%? How come, and how much will this affect my overclock?


    Pic for reference:

    https://imgur.com/a/rp1I85w
    I would say even 140% pushes the limits on conventional cooling methods.
    Are you using LN2 or something?

  3. #3
    ROG Guru: White Belt Array Enderwiggin03 PC Specs
    Enderwiggin03 PC Specs
    MotherboardROG STRIX Z390-E Gaming
    ProcessorIntel Core i9 9900k @ 5.1Ghz on all 8 cores 1.355v
    Memory (part number)F4-4266C19D-16GTZR @ 4000Mhz CL16-17-17-35 1.45v
    Graphics Card #1EVGA RTX 2070 XC Ultra
    Sound CardCreative Sound Blaster X AE-5
    MonitorASUS VG248QE
    Storage #1Samsung 970 Evo 500GB m.2
    Storage #2Samsung 860 Evo 1TB SATA
    CPU CoolerEVGA CLC280 with 4x NF-A14 iPPC-3000 PWM (push/pull)fans
    CaseFractal Design R6
    Power SupplyEVGA G3 1000w
    Keyboard Logitech G513 Carbon
    Mouse Logitech G703
    Mouse Pad Logitech Poweplay
    OS Windows 10 Home x64

    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    119

    Quote Originally Posted by Deepcuts View Post
    I would say even 140% pushes the limits on conventional cooling methods.
    Are you using LN2 or something?
    No, it affects the 9900k and it's overclocking potential.

  4. #4
    ROG Guru: White Belt Array Melkor PC Specs
    Melkor PC Specs
    MotherboardMaximus VI Formula
    ProcessorIntel i7 4790K 4.7Ghz/1.28V
    Memory (part number)G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB 2400Mhz
    Graphics Card #1Asus ROG Matrix 780Ti
    Graphics Card #2Asus ROG Matrix 780Ti
    MonitorAsus VG278HE
    Storage #1Samsung EVO 850 1TB
    CPU CoolerEK Supremacy EVO
    CaseNZXT Phantom 630
    Power SupplyCorsair AX1200i
    Keyboard Razer Deathstalker Ultimate
    Mouse Razer Ouroboros
    Mouse Pad Razer Manticor
    OS Windows 8.1 64
    Network RouterAsus RT-AC66U
    Accessory #1 2x EK-FC780 GTX Ti Matrix - Nickel
    Accessory #2 2x EK-FC780 GTX Ti Matrix Backplate - Black
    Melkor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    100

    Quote Originally Posted by Enderwiggin03 View Post
    No, it affects the 9900k and it's overclocking potential.
    Got any proof?

    From what Raja said in other thread:

    "The CPU current capability parameter sets the threshold for the VRM to shutdown. It’s a failsafe that works by monitoring how much current the VRM is supplying to the CPU. The default setting should be ample for most overclocking. You only need to increase it if the motherboard shuts down when the CPU is under load. No other reason to adjust it; there is nothing to be gained by doing so. "

    My CPU is not a golden sample like most of people You can see on the net with doing 5GHz easy, it's ****ty one actually, but I can get my 50/50/50/49/49/49/49/49 OC just like I could on earlier bios. It's most likely You would reach temperature limit on i9 before max out current anyway.

  5. #5
    ROG Guru: Yellow Belt Array x-rated PC Specs
    x-rated PC Specs
    MotherboardAsus ROG Maximus XI Formula - Intel Z390
    ProcessorIntel Core i9-9900K @ 5 GHz
    Memory (part number)G.Skill Trident Z F4-3600C16D-16GTZR - 4x 8 GB, 4 GHz, 18-18-18-38
    Graphics Card #1Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE - 2,1/15,6 GHz
    Sound CardCreative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium HD
    MonitorDell UP2715K - 5120x2880, AH-IPS, 10bit
    Storage #1Samsung 960 Pro - 1 TB, 3,5/2,1 GB/s
    Storage #2WD Red WD40EFRX - 4 TB, 64 MB, 5400 RPM
    CaseFractal Design Define R6 Blackout TG
    Power SupplyCorsair HX1000i - 1 KW, 83 A, 80Plus Platinum
    Keyboard Logitech G810 Orion Spectrum
    Mouse Logitech G403 Prodigy Wired
    Headset Sennheiser HD 660 S
    Mouse Pad Razer Manticor
    OS Windows 10 Pro
    Network RouterHuawei HG8245H @ 1 Gb/s FTTH GPON
    Accessory #1 EKWB Velocity + Vector
    Accessory #2 EKWB XRES 140 Revo D5 PWM + 2x CoolStream XE 360
    Accessory #3 6x Noiseblocker NB-eLoop Fan B12-PS
    x-rated's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Reputation
    11
    Posts
    203

    Quote Originally Posted by Enderwiggin03 View Post
    No, it affects the 9900k and it's overclocking potential.
    of course not, currently i use "auto" value and it has no impact in any benchmark, even in those most extreme ones like y-cruncher
    Last edited by x-rated; 06-30-2019 at 11:33 PM.

  6. #6
    ROG Guru: White Belt Array Enderwiggin03 PC Specs
    Enderwiggin03 PC Specs
    MotherboardROG STRIX Z390-E Gaming
    ProcessorIntel Core i9 9900k @ 5.1Ghz on all 8 cores 1.355v
    Memory (part number)F4-4266C19D-16GTZR @ 4000Mhz CL16-17-17-35 1.45v
    Graphics Card #1EVGA RTX 2070 XC Ultra
    Sound CardCreative Sound Blaster X AE-5
    MonitorASUS VG248QE
    Storage #1Samsung 970 Evo 500GB m.2
    Storage #2Samsung 860 Evo 1TB SATA
    CPU CoolerEVGA CLC280 with 4x NF-A14 iPPC-3000 PWM (push/pull)fans
    CaseFractal Design R6
    Power SupplyEVGA G3 1000w
    Keyboard Logitech G513 Carbon
    Mouse Logitech G703
    Mouse Pad Logitech Poweplay
    OS Windows 10 Home x64

    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    119

    Good to know, I do 5.1Ghz on all 8, 5.2 is doable, but cooling is insufficient for me.

  7. #7
    New ROGer Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    1

    Proof!

    Quote Originally Posted by Melkor View Post
    Got any proof?

    From what Raja said in other thread:

    "The CPU current capability parameter sets the threshold for the VRM to shutdown. It’s a failsafe that works by monitoring how much current the VRM is supplying to the CPU. The default setting should be ample for most overclocking. You only need to increase it if the motherboard shuts down when the CPU is under load. No other reason to adjust it; there is nothing to be gained by doing so. "

    My CPU is not a golden sample like most of people You can see on the net with doing 5GHz easy, it's ****ty one actually, but I can get my 50/50/50/49/49/49/49/49 OC just like I could on earlier bios. It's most likely You would reach temperature limit on i9 before max out current anyway.
    After bios update my I5-9600k with Current Capability 140% not reaching same OC level. Crashing when need more than 135W CPU Power Usage. In Prime95 before was stable 5.0 GHz AVX offset 0 and was using ~165W.

  8. #8
    ROG Enthusiast Array edrickjk PC Specs
    edrickjk PC Specs
    MotherboardASUS ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME
    ProcessorIntel Core i9-9900K
    Memory (part number)F4-4266C19-8GTZKW 8gbx4
    Graphics Card #1ASUS ROG STRIX RTX 2080 Ti GAMING OC 11G
    MonitorAcer predator X34P
    Storage #1Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
    Storage #2WDC WDS512G1X0C-00ENX0
    CPU CoolerEK-Velocity
    CasePhantek Enthoo Luxe 2
    Power SupplyCorsair HX1000I
    Keyboard Razer blackwidow x chroma
    Mouse Razer mamba wireless
    Headset SteelSeries arctis pro wireless
    Mouse Pad Razer Goliathus Control Extended
    Headset/Speakers Razer nommo chroma
    OS window 10
    Network RouterAsus RT-AC-5300

    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    66

    9900k here 5 all core ,0 avx offset and still reach 177w under heavy benchmark......at 140% they just changed the total scale not the clocking ability.I know i have a doifferent vrm,but all the asus z390 went from 170 to 140.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Untitled.png 
Views:	0 
Size:	103.4 KB 
ID:	82103
    Last edited by edrickjk; 09-30-2019 at 09:29 PM.

  9. #9
    ROG Junior Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    1

    170 percent

    Quote Originally Posted by Deepcuts View Post
    I would say even 140% pushes the limits on conventional cooling methods.
    Are you using LN2 or something?
    I noticed on my i5 9600k that at 5 ghz if I go into ai suit that if I change the percentage of cpu capability to 170 percent I jump in cinebench about a 1199 and if I change it back to 140 percent I loose about a hundred in that score 1096 so it does make a little different. im on a nzxt kraken 280 rad watter cooled. system is a asus rog z390 e gaming and 16 corsair vengeance lpx ram a corsair cx 750 m powersupply. overclocked to 5ghz on all cores and no avx offset.

  10. #10
    Administrator Array Silent Scone@ASUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Reputation
    124
    Posts
    1,831

    Current Capability simply increases the amount of current allowed through the die before OCP. If you're not experiencing any OCP behavior, it can be left alone and the default setting is of no consequence.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •