Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31
  1. #21
    ROG Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    15

    Using an Asus Rog Strix D4 as well here. Tested with 2 different kits of BDIE which are good on z390.

    4x16 GB 3200C14 and 4x8 Gb 4000C18.

    I can push the 4x16 Gb to 3600C16 nothing more. In the end I stick to 3400C14 which is more perf. But eventho I am far from the bandwith a should have with this settings. Blocked @ 50000 Mg in read.



    The second kits can't even stand his XMP profile, even with a little bump on the VCCSA and VDDQ.

    I tested as well with two sticks only. No difference.

    Now I ordered another kit of 4400C19 with different chips, the two other kits are b-die. If this one doesn't work, i'll return the kit and sell my mobo for a MSI which seems to rocks on DDR4.

    Asus should really make an effort on their z690 DDR4 mainboards.
    Last edited by Peaches182; 12-23-2021 at 01:51 PM.

  2. #22
    ROG Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    7

    I have exactly same issues.
    BIOS 0707 and BIOS 0807 have loads of instability issues, bsod and crashes.
    Running i9-12900k @ stock, 4x 8GB GSkill Trident (Samsung) @ 3200MHz CL14 (XMP1), Rog Strix Z690-A Gaming Wifi D4

    I have reverted back to 0605, which I found to be most stable bios (didn't have any crashes or bsods on it at all)
    Not sure what is going on with newer bioses :/
    Last edited by FatalityZZ; 12-23-2021 at 02:36 AM.

  3. #23
    ROG Guru: White Belt Array phatmonkey PC Specs
    phatmonkey PC Specs
    MotherboardRog Maximus Hero Z690
    Processori9 12900k
    Memory (part number)Corsair LPX Vengenace DDR5 4 x 16GB 4800mhz
    Graphics Card #1MSI RTX 3090 Suprim X
    Sound CardRealtek / Quantum 2626 / Foccusrite 18i20 3rd Gen
    MonitorPredator Z35
    CPU CoolerCorsair H150i RGB Pro XT
    CaseCorsair 900D
    Power SupplyCorsair AX1200
    Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
    Mouse Corsair Darkcore Pro SE
    Headset Audiotechnica M50X
    Mouse Pad Razzer thingy
    OS Windows 11 Pro 64bit
    phatmonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    83

    I found this article after another forum poster stated the official speed is 4000 if all ram slots are populated https://www.anandtech.com/show/16959...november-4th/4 <--- This makes sense, this is why XMP is not working for most of us

  4. #24
    ROG Enthusiast Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    46

    Quote Originally Posted by phatmonkey View Post
    I found this article after another forum poster stated the official speed is 4000 if all ram slots are populated https://www.anandtech.com/show/16959...november-4th/4 <--- This makes sense, this is why XMP is not working for most of us
    As far as I skimmed through the article I don't think this applies. First, it's about DDR5, second it's just the official Intel max spec. XMP profiles have always been considered "overclocking" and not officially supported by Intel. Or am I missing something in the article?

  5. #25
    ROG Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    15

    Quote Originally Posted by FatalityZZ View Post
    I have exactly same issues.
    BIOS 0707 and BIOS 0807 have loads of instability issues, bsod and crashes.
    Running i9-12900k @ stock, 4x 8GB GSkill Trident (Samsung) @ 3200MHz CL14 (XMP1), Rog Strix Z690-A Gaming Wifi D4

    I have reverted back to 0605, which I found to be most stable bios (didn't have any crashes or bsods on it at all)
    Not sure what is going on with newer bioses :/
    I tested all the bioses from 0807 to 0812. No improvement so far.

    Latest version are available here : https://www.overclock.net/threads/of...794802/page-68

    I was looking forward to post some nice bench results with this board on HWBot but so far the memory performances are so low that I will not even waste my time on bench.
    Last edited by Peaches182; 12-23-2021 at 01:58 PM.

  6. #26
    ROG Enthusiast Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    56


  7. #27
    ROG Enthusiast Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    46

    BIOS 0901 suddenly popped up on the official Asus page! Anyone got some info?

    btw. I'm struggling with (non-QVL) 4x8GB 3200 CL14 b-die sticks. With 0812 it wouldn't post beyond DDR-2700, lol.
    This kit ran perfectly fine up to 4000 on the Strix Z390-F.

    I just tried 0003, interesting. Was able to post and boot/benchmark at 3735. Sadly performance is quite bad, don't know what's going on, should be way higher.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image_2021-12-23_151955.png 
Views:	0 
Size:	169.3 KB 
ID:	91279

  8. #28
    ROG Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    15

    I am currently testing the 0901. So far, bandwith is decreased by another 10% and latency is ****ing crazy.

    3400C14 2T. BW 45k MB/s whereas I was able to reach 50k MB/s and latency 70ns vs 50 with the bios 0812.

    Still investigating and reducing sec and tert timings.

    It seems that they essientally loosen all the subtimings to increase the compatibility will all kits.

    Performancewise it's a pitty. I'll see if by setting all the subtimings manualy I can address this.
    Last edited by Peaches182; 12-23-2021 at 03:25 PM.

  9. #29
    ROG Enthusiast Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    46

    I've set all timings manually, so AUTO settings shouldn't bother me. Nevertheless, I don't understand why bandwidth _and_ latency is so bad. Just tried 0901, it's posting/booting, but memory performance is more or less the same as on (early, beta, testing) 0003...
    I get your point - decreasing timings to improve compatibility - but it shouldn't concern my setup. And actually it doesn't. Performance was bad, and still is bad. So I don't know what's going on. Why isn't ADL/Z690 at least able to archive similar memory performance as CFL, at least in Gear 1 mode? I don't get it because timings are actually looking ok...
    For me it's a ~20% decrease in bandwith and increase in latency, just to be clear. And I am on 1:1 divider ofc.
    Last edited by vvoid; 12-23-2021 at 07:46 PM.

  10. #30
    ROG Guru: Yellow Belt Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Reputation
    19
    Posts
    178

    https://www.overclock.net/threads/of.../post-28916500

    901 and 707 Seem oc for me on 2x8. Not sure how they are on 4x8. Havent test 2x16 b die yet on 901. Post some sr results on aida64 at link. Had to raise tcl to 15 to pass Karhu memtest.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	901 sr 4000c15.jpg 
Views:	0 
Size:	359.3 KB 
ID:	91337
    Last edited by bscool; 12-25-2021 at 07:29 AM.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •