04-18-2013 07:00 AM
04-18-2013 07:10 AM
04-18-2013 07:37 AM
04-18-2013 07:40 AM
Nodens wrote:
Found them thanks:) It looks like they claim 17db which is very impressive but they're not PWM and only 0.06inchH2O which translates to 1.524mmH2O. That's a bit low for the dense radiator of the H100 considering the stock has 3.1mmH2O. The Cougar is supposedly at 2.2mmH2O at 17.9dB (if those numbers are legit of course heh).
04-18-2013 07:19 AM
04-18-2013 07:26 AM
04-18-2013 07:27 AM
04-18-2013 07:49 AM
Arne Saknussemm wrote:
Not a fan expert by any means but been through this choice myself so for what it's worth I'll add my 2 cents.
The Cougars are great and if you want a first hand account just ask Zka17 amongst others.
But for the H100 I would go for the Noctua NF-F12 pwm. I have these and really like them. The only reason I say this is the higher static pressure 2.61 which is more than the 2.2 of the cougars (they do have less air flow 93.4m3/h vs the cougars 120 m3/h and a bit more noise 18.6 to 17.9 db). I think for the dense radiator of the H100 the extra pressure will actually give you a bit of a better result.
04-19-2013 10:17 AM
Nodens wrote:
Excellent! I just checked the specs out on Noctua's site. It seems that 2.61mmH2O is at 1500RPM which is rated at 22.4db. Still that's very very good (and insanely more quiet than the stock 35db). Yes, I also believe static pressure is needed to produce results with this radiator. So far these look more attractive than the Cougars! And I do trust Noctua's numbers much more (only reason for that was that I had never heard of the Cougars before I started researching this).
04-18-2013 07:55 AM