11-16-2013 01:52 AM - last edited on 03-06-2024 06:45 PM by ROGBot
11-16-2013 11:22 AM
11-16-2013 03:18 PM
kkn wrote:
http://www.asus.com/Monitors_Projectors/VG278HE/
only problem is thick edges on the frame it self.
11-16-2013 03:30 PM
11-16-2013 08:50 PM
chrsplmr wrote:
Hey .. Do you talk to your Mother like that ??? We respect each other here .. it will serve you well to do like wise.
TheSurroundGamer. Welcome to ROG.
kkn: Thanks but that is a 16:9 monitor, in case you missed it, looking for 16:10, BIG ?
A quick review of Asus Products Pages http://www.asus.com/Commercial_Monitors_Projectors/
shows you are correct OP, nothing over 24in. in the 16:10's ... so far.
Hopefully if enough speak out for this, demand, then .... someday soon 'we' hope.
This one's a beauty though .. 16:9 x 27" : http://www.asus.com/Commercial_Monitors_Projectors/PB278Q/
Best of Luck. Nice Videos, btw. .c.
11-17-2013 08:31 AM
chrsplmr wrote:
Hey .. Do you talk to your Mother like that ??? We respect each other here .. it will serve you well to do like wise.
11-17-2013 10:55 AM
MarshallR@ASUS wrote:
1) Can only use what's available from the LCD maker. We don't manufacture this part. 16:10 is reserved for professional market only these days; don't blame us - talk to LG/Samsung/Japan Display/AUO etc
2) I'm pushing this but the price has got to come down too, which again is not dependent on us and larger displays = more materials = more cost. Lots of capacity has been pushed to phones and tablets so PCs are down the priority list for them. I can see an explosion of 2560 gamers as soon as the price is right because loads of people want to upgrade their 1080p monitors and they aren't replacing with another 1080.
3) Sure, but then you'll have to live with TN.
4) Everything bar PA is LED backlit these days.
5) Gaming monitors will always be >60, which again = TN.
6) Gotta have HDMI, DP. DVI should die like VGA, imo. Color quality is down to the processing chip inside, not the cable. HDMI=DP=DVI in terms of what data is passed over.
7) Very difficult and increases cost, but yes, it's certainly something I have been pushing.
Zygomorphic wrote:
I'd love to see the 16:10 ratio, too. @MarshallR, if you would encourage ASUS to lobby the panel manufacturers, then maybe they would listen?
@TheSurroundGamer, as to the type of input, any digital input is fine. However, HDMI has been limited in terms of bandwidth until 1.4. Displayport is fine, as is DVI (@MarshallR).
Arne Saknussemm wrote:
I'll second that...;)
Here is a good article on screen size and why 16:9 seems likely to stay.... http://semiaccurate.com/2013/10/11/amd-solves-4k-display-problems-vesa-display-id-v1-3/
Tripple screen is a bit of a gimmick and accounts for a very small market and looking at those videos (not sure if it's the dodgy camera angle) certainly not for me!..looks distorted...I find myself looking at the centre screen only in order to avoid the distortion on the outer two... and the bezles!!
16:9 aspect ratio is not a random choice...it is based on the field of view of human eyes. A much cleverer surround setup would be three 1920x1080 monitors together but all in portrait... (15.2:9)
Much prefer a single large hi res screen....they are coming...
11-17-2013 02:43 AM
11-17-2013 03:15 AM
11-24-2013 12:33 PM