the benchmark, lol AMD is targeting Sandy Bridge the new 2011 is supose to be 46% more performing than a Sandy Bridge, but it will not be cheap of course
.jpg "Raja"){kind=avatar}
AMD/Intel war is about to heat up, eh?
jaytheredneck , don't sell the fur of the bear before have kill it , We know nothing of Dozer ............ aside it's an Intel tread so go make your AMD fanboyish stuff elsewhere please. We are talking about real stuff here. A side until proof than I’m wrong a 2500k and 2600k is more powerful than a Dozer in many application, example; games don’t need more than 3 cores , And a nice GeneZ with a 2500k will cost way more ….. Also Intel will not only release Extreme Edition, they will have more affordable CPU that fit socket 2011, Jewie is talking about a $ 500 CPU not a CPU and a Board, and not an Extreme, with $ 500, chance are he will fine a socket 2011 CPU that fit his taste. What was the price of the i7-920 at release ?????
grok23 wrote:
Why do I still keep seeing this line of garbage put out all the time in 2011? .
I'm gone make you a MarkedOne garbage reply..... what I means with 3 cores is it will not use more than 100 % cpu usage if you use a 3 cores, so do the math; 75% of 4 cores and that's make only 50% on 6 cores. So no need for a 6, 8, 10 or 12 cores for gaming, as Xero said cores speeds not number of them is the key. Now if you talk about VM , that's a different story as we add the frequency of each cores to compute the capability of the build
so I use a i7-2600k and a i7-965 extreme edition for my gamings PC , for my Workstation I use my 990x 6 cores as I do more VM on it. ( actually a i5-2500k will be more than enough for my gaming build, but I still throw some VM on it.
