01-26-2015 10:57 AM - last edited 3 weeks ago by ROGBot
01-26-2015 02:11 PM
01-26-2015 11:16 PM
01-27-2015 09:38 AM
01-30-2015 02:20 AM
sWaZi sKunk wrote:
It's been said TIME and TIME again that running a single high proformance card WILL yield better result then running 2 cut-down cards in SLI, why should this be any different. Just because youtube channels failed to display the technical specs, and the engineering diagrams doesn't mean nVidia was trying to scam people. When I was researching to go with 970 sli vs 980 I cam across a lot of this information and even with a just on the first lap of the race it was clear that the 970 was not FULLY enabled, not should it have been it's not a top tier card! Many benchmark elitists were scratching their head on the real world difference in HIGH RES with the two cards and maybe we see why? Among other things. Had I of not done the research I could possibly see being upset having bought this card, and then I would remember what I bought it for and still be happy. The card is a bang/buck card even with 3.5gb (if you want to say that). If I upgraded my 780ti for a extra gig then maybe I would actually be upset.
All argument aside what does Asus have to account for? If you feel betrayed the fault is nVidia's not Asus. They still took a awesome card, and made it amazing.. I would like to see someone say that their recommendation for a GTX970 today or even tomorrow is going to change.
01-27-2015 06:15 PM
01-27-2015 06:45 PM
01-28-2015 08:49 AM
01-29-2015 09:19 AM
01-29-2015 10:42 AM