Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    ROG Guru: Green Belt Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Reputation
    32
    Posts
    533

    Question G751 (980m) Display Port (TB) 1.2 SST Support @ 4k?

    Just wondering if anyone has a 4k monitor that utilizes SST in use with their G751.

    I know technically this should not be a concern. I am getting ready to fork over for a Philips BDM4065UC - 40" 4K monitor. Return policies / consumer protection laws are practically non existent here in the Philippines, so it would make me feel much better about the purchase if someone could confirm everything works as expected from personal experience.

    Many thanks -Josh

  2. #2
    ROG Enthusiast Array Zombievac PC Specs
    Zombievac PC Specs
    Laptop (Model)ASUS RoG G751JY-DH71
    MotherboardASUS P9X79 PRO
    ProcessorIntel Core i7-3820 @ 4.63GHz
    Memory (part number)G.Skill F3-14900CL8-4GBZM (QTY 4 - 16GB)
    Graphics Card #1ASUS GTX 980 4GB @ 1391MHz (Core/Boost) / 7.7GHz (Memory)
    Graphics Card #2EVGA GTX 960 SC 2GB (PhysX only)
    MonitorSamsung 48" 3D LED TV
    Storage #1Samsung 840 EVO 1TB SSD
    Storage #2WD 4TB 7200RPM
    CPU CoolerNoctua NH-D14 SE2011 140mm and 120mm SSO CPU Cooler
    CaseRosewill THOR V2 (XL-ATX)
    Power SupplyFirePower 750FTY Fatal1ty 750W
    Keyboard Razer BlackWidow Chroma Mechanical Gaming Keyboard
    Mouse Razer DeathAdder 2013
    Headset Turtle Beach EarForce PX4
    Mouse Pad Razer Goliathus Control Mat
    Headset/Speakers Logitech Z-5500 505 Watt 5.1 Digital Surround Speakers
    OS Windows 8.1 Pro
    Network RouterNetgear NightHawk X6 AC3200 Tri-Band WiFi Router
    Accessory #1 CyberPower 1350VA UPS with LCD Display

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Reputation
    14
    Posts
    67

    EDIT: Ok, I now know what you mean by SST. I believe that monitor does, read the user reviews, but...

    Out of curiosity, if you're gaming, which you should be with this laptop... why not go for a G-sync monitor if you're going to spend that much money? You can get a 1440p IPS-panel with G-sync (Acer), and 1440p is much more appropriate for gaming anyway (unless you want to sacrifice a lot of graphical fidelity for extreme resolution).

    If you haven't tried G-sync, well, it's worth it but you have to see it in person, unfortunately. You can use the hacked drivers mentioned elsewhere on this forum to try g-sync in most of its glory on the G751's built in display, actually! But it's not real g-sync, as it still gets "blackouts" when your framerate dips below 25 FPS or so.
    Last edited by Zombievac; 05-30-2015 at 03:41 AM.

  3. #3
    ROG Guru: Green Belt Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Reputation
    32
    Posts
    533

    Quote Originally Posted by Zombievac View Post
    EDIT: Ok, I now know what you mean by SST. I believe that monitor does, read the user reviews, but...

    Out of curiosity, if you're gaming, which you should be with this laptop... why not go for a G-sync monitor if you're going to spend that much money? You can get a 1440p IPS-panel with G-sync (Acer), and 1440p is much more appropriate for gaming anyway (unless you want to sacrifice a lot of graphical fidelity for extreme resolution).

    If you haven't tried G-sync, well, it's worth it but you have to see it in person, unfortunately. You can use the hacked drivers mentioned elsewhere on this forum to try g-sync in most of its glory on the G751's built in display, actually! But it's not real g-sync, as it still gets "blackouts" when your framerate dips below 25 FPS or so.
    That monitor definitely uses SST. That is why I am looking for someone using the same

    While I do game, it is not what I use the laptop for primarily. For me the G751 is a mobile workstation that I can play games on.

    This monitor appeals to me as it is exactly like having 4 x 20" 1080p panels w/o any bezel in the way. No need to use any DPI scaling just a crap ton of desktop real estate at native rez for productivity. A 4k monitor usable at native resolution like this Philips has exactly 2x the desktop real estate of a 1440p monitor.

    As well when it come to games while playing at 1080p there will be no funny scaling as the pixels are simply doubled so everything stays crispy. For less demanding titles you can still play at 2160p For games in between and where appropriate (i.e. FPS games) you can set up a custom res to get a 21:9 ratio (or some other ratio) and get two benefits from that, higher performance from pushing fewer pixels, and a more panoramic experience. I doubt I'll miss the pixels sitting in front of a monitor nearly 3ft (1m) wide hehe.

    For my needs and wants this panel is more versatile and useful. And... it is a 40" panel, that gets my inner nerd's blood flowing haha.
    Last edited by joshindaphils; 05-30-2015 at 05:15 AM.

  4. #4
    ROG Guru: Green Belt Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Reputation
    32
    Posts
    533

    So pretty sure SST is not an issue like 99.95%, but getting ready to pull the trigger. Would love some confirmation from someone -Thanks!

  5. #5
    ROG Guru: Green Belt Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Reputation
    32
    Posts
    533

    So no forum love on an SST @ 4k support...

    Went ahead and pulled the trigger. Will update after it arrives in case someone else goes searching for an answer.

  6. #6
    ROG Guru: Green Belt Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Reputation
    32
    Posts
    533

    So just for anyone searching for the answer, yes as anticipated 4k over SST works great.

    On a side note I am very impressed how the 980m stands up to gaming at these resolutions. You are most certainly not playing DA:I with everything set to max, but there a point where lower setting at 4k is nicer to my eyes then high settings at 1080p.

    I would imagine this isn't the case for all games, I've only tested a few. Older titles like L.A. Noir play spectacularly at 4k with setting just dialed down a bit, it is pretty amazing coming from a laptop IMO.

  7. #7
    Console gamer, PC hater Array Xehanort PC Specs
    Xehanort PC Specs
    Laptop (Model)Asus G751JY-T7029H
    MotherboardAsus G751JY
    Processori7 4860HQ, 2.4GHz (3.6GHz Turbo)
    Memory (part number)32GB (4x8GB)
    Graphics Card #1NVidia GTX 980M, 4GB VRAM
    Graphics Card #2Intel® Iris™ Pro Graphics 5200 (disabled)
    Sound CardIntel Lynx Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller [C2]
    MonitorLG Display LP173WF4-SPD1
    Storage #1Samsung M.2 SSD XP941, 512GB
    Storage #2Hitachi 7200RPM, 1TB
    OS Windows 10
    Xehanort's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Reputation
    11
    Posts
    83

    Quote Originally Posted by joshindaphils View Post
    So just for anyone searching for the answer, yes as anticipated 4k over SST works great.

    On a side note I am very impressed how the 980m stands up to gaming at these resolutions. You are most certainly not playing DA:I with everything set to max, but there a point where lower setting at 4k is nicer to my eyes then high settings at 1080p.

    I would imagine this isn't the case for all games, I've only tested a few. Older titles like L.A. Noir play spectacularly at 4k with setting just dialed down a bit, it is pretty amazing coming from a laptop IMO.
    That's great news, thanks for sharing.

    I also plan on getting a 4K monitor, i'm undecided between Asus PB279Q and Asus ProArt PA328Q, but what is this MST and SST? What is the difference between them, and what do they do?

  8. #8
    ROG Guru: Green Belt Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Reputation
    32
    Posts
    533

    Basically SST or single stream transport is how things should be. DP supports multiple stream transports... in layman's terms one DP connection can provide output to multiple displays or MST multiple stream transport.

    With early 4k displays the hardware did not exist to provide 4k @ 60Hz over a single stream. So the monitor presented itself as 2 'displays' or rather used a MST connection. This was effectively a standard for early 4k displays as SST was not available...

    I am still adjusting to this monster... it is truly spectacular. I was running 3 x 1080p screens, though I had to put one aside as I don't have the desk pace for it with the new monitor... however with this and the 2 other displays (including the laptop) it provides more pixels than 3 x 1440p displays and 2x the pixel count I had before. It is a remarkable environment that works because there is no need for DPI scaling, I know some love the crisp hi-dpi look, but for me 111 DPI is still crisp and you get to maximize every pixel.

    I anticipate the 38-42" 4k market really heating up within the next year due to this. If you are dead set on a IPS panel it may be worthwhile to consider waiting a few more months and seeing what other panels open up in this space.
    Last edited by joshindaphils; 06-29-2015 at 08:59 PM.

  9. #9
    ROG Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Reputation
    10
    Posts
    5

    Stick to IPS, nothing else is worth it unless you're just pure focused on gaming like a kid with no life.
    IPS screen with calibration offers so much more for accuracy, colour depth, and quality in visual pleasure.

  10. #10
    ROG Guru: Green Belt Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Reputation
    32
    Posts
    533

    Quote Originally Posted by sdfsfede View Post
    Stick to IPS, nothing else is worth it unless you're just pure focused on gaming like a kid with no life.
    IPS screen with calibration offers so much more for accuracy, colour depth, and quality in visual pleasure.
    Very subjective. I can't complain about this VA panel for the size, quality, and price. Some of the less appealing VA qualities are enhanced by the size and pixel count of this 40"er but I knew the drawbacks before purchasing. Like all panel tech there are plus and minuses for each. For instance this panel has very good sRGB coverage that will beat many lesser IPS panels and a contrast ratio that IPS can only dream of today, well north of 4000:1 actual.

    I have IPS when I need color accuracy as I do have that need in my work flow, then I have this VA for real productivity where I can look at and work with vast swaths of code and reference material compared to well really anything else on the market.

    There simply exist no well known name brand monitors (even then Philips isn't exactly known for monitors) with warranty coverage that you can comfortably run 4k w/o DPI scaling. This should change in the coming months with IPS hitting as well. These will also likely cost more when they do hit.

    If I were to be as dismissive as you I would state "Buy this VA panel if you need to do real work, buy IPS for looking at pretty pictures and generally acting like an art snob." This of course would be a simplistic and wrong view even if it is applicable to some.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •