Results 1 to 10 of 19
-
11-11-2015 07:40 PM #1
kaese PC Specs Motherboard X99 Rampage V Extreme Processor 5820K
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Reputation
- 25
- Posts
- 65
From BIOS 1601 to 1701 produces RAM compatibility issues
I have a RAM Kit (type 32GB HyperX FURY DDR4-2666, Quad-Kit) that can boot and run flawlessly on BIOS 1601, while in contrary BIOS 1701 fails to boot or run the same kit at 2666 MHz (even after intense tweaking).
So, RAM compatibility has decreased (at least for my case).
Now, especially because 1701 has a microcode update, I dont want to be stuck to BIOS 1601 forever!
Does anybody have some insight, onto what has changed from 1601 to 1701 regarding DDR4 control?
Note that I made the same observation with two CPUs (5820K - different batch: one Costa Rica and one Malaysia) and two identical RAM-Kits.Last edited by kaese; 11-11-2015 at 07:59 PM.
-
11-11-2015 10:00 PM #2
GoNz0- PC Specs Laptop (Model) Dell XPS 9530 Motherboard Rampage V Extreme Processor 5930 Memory (part number) [Ripjaws 4] F4-2666C15Q-16GRR Graphics Card #1 Asus Strix GTX980 CPU Cooler Ek Evo Supremacy Case Corsair 800D Power Supply Enermax 1250w revolution 85 Keyboard Logitech 710+ Mouse Razer Mamba 2012 Headset Sennheiser PC350 OS Windows 8.1 Pro Network Router Asus AC68u
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Reputation
- 24
- Posts
- 568
Welcome to Asus, they will tell you that you need to tweak a ram kit that they once said is compatible as they broke something. Not that they will admit to that!
Have you tried running it at 100blk instead of the 125 it tends to set to when you enable XMP?
Also did you play with the system agent voltage as it seems to point to that as well.
-
11-12-2015 03:45 PM #3
kaese PC Specs Motherboard X99 Rampage V Extreme Processor 5820K
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Reputation
- 25
- Posts
- 65
Yes, I tried both 100 and 125 blk but there was not much of a difference (in general, I noticed a tendency to more stability at 100).
I tried some V_SA tuning but not excessively - I will do that on the weekend....
The weird thing is with 1701 it doesnt even work out-of-the box with only one module... At least the board has a lot of features as Retry and MemOK!
-
11-12-2015 05:13 PM #4
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Reputation
- 339
- Posts
- 15,254
A lot goes on behind BIOS updates and the automatic rules gets changed a lot. That's one of the reason why I discourage users to update their BIOS if their system is perfectly stable. With that said, your settings on one revision will not carry over to a newer revision. For example if you used a value of 1.12V for System Agent voltage on one revision, you might need to tweak it again.
On a sidenote I am using that exact kit on the Maximus VIII Extreme. Let me install it on the Rampage V Extreme when I get home and I'll let you know what I find.
-
11-13-2015 12:44 AM #5
kaese PC Specs Motherboard X99 Rampage V Extreme Processor 5820K
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Reputation
- 25
- Posts
- 65
Hi Chino,
I would be very much interested in hearing from your tests with the very same Kit.
Let me remark, that if auto-settings change a lot from one version to another, the settings dont seem to be well under control by the manufacturer. If that is the case (and I believe there may be many reasons, such as huge variance of available RAM Kits in combination with "individual" CPUs), sharing of detailed information for an enthusiast mainboard would always be highly appreciated.
By the way, BIOS V1601 runs the kit @2666MHz with V_SA on auto, setting a quite low voltage of 0.85V (HWinfo64). My RAM modules are manufactured week 34/2015 (both kits).
-
11-13-2015 02:56 AM #6
Just reflash back to 1601 and save yourself the headache. The new microcode won't do anything for you at the moment. I'm still on 1502, and everything is running flawlessly.
Last edited by Techotic; 11-13-2015 at 02:59 AM.
-
11-13-2015 03:11 AM #7
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Reputation
- 339
- Posts
- 15,254
You've said so yourself. With so many CPUs out there, it's impossible to sample them all to define a more accurate scaling routine. What they do is sample a few hundred of them.
Anyway, here are few benchmarks with the FURY DDR4-2666 32GB kit. I'll drop some HCI Memtest or Google Stress App runs later on when I get the chance.
-
11-14-2015 02:34 AM #8
mdzcpa PC Specs Motherboard Maximus Hero XI Processor 9900k @ 5.1Ghz All Core 1.315v AVX -2 Memory (part number) Gskill GTZ 4133 C17 32GB (4x8GB) Graphics Card #1 ROG Strix 2080 TI OC Sound Card On Board Monitor ROG PG348Q Storage #1 Samsung 970 Pro M.2 512GB for OS & APPS Storage #2 Samsung 970 Pro M.2 1TB for GAMES CPU Cooler ROG Ryujin 360 Case Phanteks Evolv X Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1000W Titanium Keyboard Corsair K70 LUX RGB Mouse Corsair M65 RGB Headset Corsaur VOID Pro Mouse Pad Corsair MM300 Wide Desk Mat OS WIN 10 Pro Network Router Linksys VELOP Accessory #1 ROG 751JY Laptop for Moobile Gaming Accessory #2 Koolance EXC-800 Chiller Accessory #3 25+ years of overclocking
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Reputation
- 80
- Posts
- 977
THIS ^
Unless there is a new feature you absolutely must have, updating the BIOS is never a good idea if your system is already stable. Sure, the first few BIOS revisions can bring some tweaks to added stability and maybe overclockability, but after that there is no reason to update unless you need to.
I'm still on 0802 :O
-
11-14-2015 04:24 AM #9
Korth PC Specs Motherboard ASUS X99 R5E (BIOS2101/1902) Processor Haswell-EP E5-1680-3 SR20H/R2 (4.4GHz) Memory (part number) Vengeance LPX 4x8GB SS DDR4-3000 (CMK32GX4M4C3000C15) Graphics Card #1 NVIDIA Quadro GP100GL/16GB, 16xPCIe3, NVLink1 (SLI-HB) Graphics Card #2 NVIDIA Quadro GP100GL/16GB, 16xPCIe3, NVLink1 (SLI-HB) Sound Card JDS Labs O2+ODAC (RevB), USB2 UAC1 Monitor ASUS PG278Q Storage #1 Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSDs, 4xSATA3 RAID0 Storage #2 Comay BladeDrive E28 3200GB SSD, 8xPCIe2 CPU Cooler Raijintek NEMESIS/TISIS, AS5, 2xNH-A14 Case Obsidian 750D (original), 6xNH-A14 Power Supply Zalman/FSP ZM1250 Platinum Headset Pilot P51 PTT *modded* OS Arch, Gentoo, Win7x64, Win10x64 Network Router Actiontec T3200M VDSL2 Gateway Accessory #1 TP-Link AC1900 Archer T9E, 1xPCIe Accessory #2 ASUS/Infineon SLB9635 TPM (TT1.2/FW3.19) Accessory #3 ASUS OC Panel I (FW0501)
- Join Date
- Mar 2015
- Reputation
- 152
- Posts
- 2,719
The simplest solution would be to stick with BIOS 1601 "forever". No need to flash new firmware until it actually does something good for your system. This isn't really that bad an option if no new BIOS updates ever do anything useful for you anyhow.
Or hope that whatever compatibility issue the BIOS 1701 microcode update introduced will be fixed in a subsequent BIOS release. Maybe your feedback will actually provoke Asus into fixing this new compatibility issue. Good luck.
Or just use different RAM. Costs money but solves the problem forever - or at least solves the problem until another Asus BIOS breaks compatibility again.
-
11-15-2015 02:57 AM #10
kaese PC Specs Motherboard X99 Rampage V Extreme Processor 5820K
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Reputation
- 25
- Posts
- 65
Actually, I appreciate a lot, Asus continuously publishes new versions of BIOS for the RVE. By the way, being told to stuck forever to a prior BIOS version does not feel like an adequate solution to me for an high-end OC flagship board, especially for tech enthusiasts.
Thanks for testing, Chino, can you confirm, BIOS V1701 worked with XMP auto settings without further tweaking?
Anyway, I am now very happy, I found stable settings with BIOS 1701 - even running two 32Gb kits at the same time (what is a completely different story of course)! I guess GoNz0- was on the right track with the 100 Mhz Blck. For anybody interested, please find the detailed settings in the images. Possibly, some of the voltages could still be optimized but I can work with it for now at 24/7.
There are a few things I wondered:
1. It is necessary to give the cache voltage a slight offset, otherwise the CPU seems to have problems keeping up RAM clock in or switching to idle (= C1/C2-states). I do not fully understand that: isnt the IMC dependent rather on system agent voltage? Does it make sense?
2. Regarding the V_Cache Offset mode: According to the BIOS-text message (Total Adaptive Mode CPU Cache Voltage, it is set to 1.07V+0.1V=1.17V. Is this correct? Because HWInfo64 (v5.06-2640) shows only 1.05 V.
3. I have to turn of memory check of at startup - however I believe it is stable (after using the settings for 72 h with several stress tests) otherwise I get a bd q-code error.
4. RAM-Voltage is set to 1.285V in BIOS but HWInfo and BIOS it shows higher values (typically 1.303 V, never less than 1.297V). Event though I left the RAM Eventual Voltage on auto, it is weird as the eventual voltage should if only apply during startups, isnt it?
Any suggestions very welcome.