cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Intel 750 vs Samsung 950

Hopper64
Level 15
Any opinions as to which drive is preferred? Both seem to be well matched in terms of performance.
MZ790A Bios 2002, GSkill F5-8000J3848H16GX2-TZRK, 13900KS, EKWB D5 TBE 300, Seasonic Prime TX-1600 ATX 3.0, Asus Strix 4090 w/ Optimus block, Phanteks Enthoo Elite, Asus Claymore 2, Asus Gladius 3, Asus XG349C, Samsung 990, Windows 11 Pro
7,181 Views
16 REPLIES 16

Karl-Johan
Level 7
Boot times are alot slower with the Intel drive. I got tired of it after a while and got the 950 instead.
Fractal Design North Svart TG * AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 4.2 GHz 145MB * ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero * G.Skill 128GB (4x32GB) DDR5 6000MHz CL30 Trident Z5 Neo * Crucial T700 2TB M.2 NVMe PCIe Gen 5 * ASUS ROG Ryuo III 240 A-RGB * ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 16GB GDDR6X OC Edition * be quiet! Dark Power 13 1000W * ASUS ProArt PA32UCX-K * Dali Mentor Menuet SE 2.0 * Windows 11 Pro x64 Canary Insider

Hopper64
Level 15
I'm just a bit put off by the heat with the Samsung drive, but I was thinking of using that Angelbird heat sink with it. That would solve the heat problem, but wouldn't that still cause slow boot times in a PCIe slot instead of the M.2 slot?
MZ790A Bios 2002, GSkill F5-8000J3848H16GX2-TZRK, 13900KS, EKWB D5 TBE 300, Seasonic Prime TX-1600 ATX 3.0, Asus Strix 4090 w/ Optimus block, Phanteks Enthoo Elite, Asus Claymore 2, Asus Gladius 3, Asus XG349C, Samsung 990, Windows 11 Pro

Qwinn
Level 11
With my Intel 750, my total boot time to Windows login is about 33 seconds on pre-3000 bios, 40 seconds on 3101. That's on a cold boot, restart seems to take about half the time. Slow for an SSD, but not horribly so, and I never have any temp issues with it. Just figured I'd supply some numbers instead of a vague "slow".

Hopper64
Level 15
Yea. I'm wondering if the Samsung drive will still behave the same since it will be in a PCIE slot.
MZ790A Bios 2002, GSkill F5-8000J3848H16GX2-TZRK, 13900KS, EKWB D5 TBE 300, Seasonic Prime TX-1600 ATX 3.0, Asus Strix 4090 w/ Optimus block, Phanteks Enthoo Elite, Asus Claymore 2, Asus Gladius 3, Asus XG349C, Samsung 990, Windows 11 Pro

Karl-Johan
Level 7
Here's a review of the Angelbird Wings PCIe-adapter with a 950. http://www.anandtech.com/show/9856/angelbird-wings-px1-m2-adapter-review-do-ssds-need-heatsinks
Fractal Design North Svart TG * AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 4.2 GHz 145MB * ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero * G.Skill 128GB (4x32GB) DDR5 6000MHz CL30 Trident Z5 Neo * Crucial T700 2TB M.2 NVMe PCIe Gen 5 * ASUS ROG Ryuo III 240 A-RGB * ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 16GB GDDR6X OC Edition * be quiet! Dark Power 13 1000W * ASUS ProArt PA32UCX-K * Dali Mentor Menuet SE 2.0 * Windows 11 Pro x64 Canary Insider

jrmcdou
Level 10
There is no speed decrease using the Angelbird adapter. I plan on using one myself when I get the 950 Pro. Waiting on the new Rampage V board before I order though.
Rampage VI Extreme bios 1503
Core i9 7980XE @ 4.4ghz all cores
64 gb Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 3600
2x RTX 2080 Ti FE NvLink/SLI
2x Samsung 970 Pro 1tb NVME
Corsair AX1600i
Corsair 1000D case
1x Dell U3818DW 38" Curved Ultrawide and 2x Dell S2716DG 27" 1ms GSYNC 2560x1440 144 hz
Win 10 Pro x64

Hopper64
Level 15
Wonder why the Intel drives are so slow on boot then compared to Samsung's 950 while connected to a PCIe slot?
MZ790A Bios 2002, GSkill F5-8000J3848H16GX2-TZRK, 13900KS, EKWB D5 TBE 300, Seasonic Prime TX-1600 ATX 3.0, Asus Strix 4090 w/ Optimus block, Phanteks Enthoo Elite, Asus Claymore 2, Asus Gladius 3, Asus XG349C, Samsung 990, Windows 11 Pro

Qwinn
Level 11
Something about initialization and error correcting for server platform use, as the Intel 750 is designed for both. I'll post the link where I asked about this on Intel forums when I get home in a few hours.