01-09-2017 05:53 AM - last edited on 03-06-2024 08:26 PM by ROGBot
01-09-2017 08:26 AM
02-28-2017 01:54 PM
jasonvp wrote:
This is more for the Asus folks who frequent the board. I understand NDA stuff and not being able to talk about products that are yet released. My question centers around the new PG27UQ that was shown and announced at CES. It's the 27" panel that we caught a glimpse of back during the summer of 2016; a model number, price tag, and release date have finally been given to it.
Question: why did you stick with the 27" screen size? 4K really calls out for something larger, more on the order of 30" or 32". Was it a concern over the price you'd need to charge for a larger panel? Yeah, $1200 is a bit to cough up for a 27" 4K GSync 144Hz panel that does HDR, but I'd internally budgeted $2K US for a larger one with those same specs. Others like me exist and would pay more for the bigger panel. So: was it a technical limitation or a budgetary one?
02-28-2017 02:01 PM
Zenairis wrote:
I think it's about right with the 27"
02-28-2017 04:52 PM
jasonvp wrote:
Great, then you can buy a 27". I don't think it's "about right" and I believe it should be larger. But since Asus isn't actually making the panel itself, they're sort of at the whim of the producing company. And said company may not have the wherewithal to make anything larger.
03-20-2017 10:26 AM
jasonvp wrote:
Great, then you can buy a 27". I don't think it's "about right" and I believe it should be larger. But since Asus isn't actually making the panel itself, they're sort of at the whim of the producing company. And said company may not have the wherewithal to make anything larger.
04-09-2017 07:08 AM
lufiron wrote:
They have the Pro Art 32" version which was revealed at the same event. *
03-07-2017 09:15 PM