Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    ROG Guru: Green Belt Array Heini PC Specs
    Heini PC Specs
    MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z170 MARK 1
    Processori7-6700K
    Memory (part number)G.SKILL TridentZ (2 x 16GB) F4-3000C14D
    Graphics Card #1Evga 2080Ti XC Ultra
    Sound CardAsus Essence STX II
    MonitorASUS MG279Q
    Storage #1Samsung 950 Pro 512GB
    CPU CoolerNoctua NH-D15
    CaseCooler Master HAF XB EVO
    Power SupplyEVGA SuperNOVA G3 1000W
    Keyboard Ducky Shine 6 (Brown Cherry MX)
    Mouse Secret (Ducky)
    Headset Sennheiser HD 580
    Mouse Pad EVGA TORQ
    Headset/Speakers Logitech Z906
    OS Win10 Pro 64
    Heini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Reputation
    50
    Posts
    600

    g-sync: is it worth it?

    I'm using an ASUS MG279Q free-sync monitor (1440p@144hz) with a Titan Xp card and all is working well for me. It seems that there's plenty of problems with getting g-sync to work in different games and configurations so why should I consider buying another monitor just for g-sync?

  2. #2
    ROG Guru: Black Belt Array Korth PC Specs
    Korth PC Specs
    MotherboardASUS X99 R5E (BIOS2101/1902)
    ProcessorHaswell-EP E5-1680-3 SR20H/R2 (4.4GHz)
    Memory (part number)Vengeance LPX 4x8GB SS DDR4-3000 (CMK32GX4M4C3000C15)
    Graphics Card #1NVIDIA Quadro GP100GL/16GB, 16xPCIe3, NVLink1 (SLI-HB)
    Graphics Card #2NVIDIA Quadro GP100GL/16GB, 16xPCIe3, NVLink1 (SLI-HB)
    Sound CardJDS Labs O2+ODAC (RevB), USB2 UAC1
    MonitorASUS PG278Q
    Storage #1Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSDs, 4xSATA3 RAID0
    Storage #2Comay BladeDrive E28 3200GB SSD, 8xPCIe2
    CPU CoolerRaijintek NEMESIS/TISIS, AS5, 2xNH-A14
    CaseObsidian 750D (original), 6xNH-A14
    Power SupplyZalman/FSP ZM1250 Platinum
    Headset Pilot P51 PTT *modded*
    OS Arch, Gentoo, Win7x64, Win10x64
    Network RouterActiontec T3200M VDSL2 Gateway
    Accessory #1 TP-Link AC1900 Archer T9E, 1xPCIe
    Accessory #2 ASUS/Infineon SLB9635 TPM (TT1.2/FW3.19)
    Accessory #3 ASUS OC Panel I (FW0501)
    Korth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Reputation
    152
    Posts
    2,719

    You probably already know that your (AMD) FreeSync monitor needs to be paired with (AMD) FreeSync GPU or your (NVIDIA) G-Sync GPU needs to be paired with (NVIDIA) G-Sync monitor. Your mismatched pairing defaults your GPU and monitor to generic V-Sync.

    You'll get (and should solicit) many opinions about the value of FreeSync/G-Sync.

    I'm of the opinion that G-Sync is vastly overhyped, overmarketed, and overpriced. It reduces tearing (and other display artifacts caused by incomplete rendering) by reducing fps: basically slowing things down until busy GPU(s) can catch up. I find the illusion isn't really worth the intermittent (slightly obvious and sometimes annoying) fps throttling it causes - especially since its real value is in hard fps gaming (vs hard fps opponents) where the last thing you want to do is run your game slower than your opponents - and the reality is that you need a combination of overworked GPU(s) and saturated PCIe bus and loaded DP bandwidth and high fps (at the threshold of your display's capabilities) for screen tearing to even occur, it can happen with some frequency in heavy games but not frequently enough to justify constant ultra-quality-enhancing performance slowdowns.

    G-Sync is also incompatible with ULMB (and a few other technologies) which act in their own ways to improve display quality, so it's really a question of tradeoffs when you're pushing things hard enough for G-Sync's limitations to activate. Interestingly, FreeSync does not suffer from as many of these limitations.

    (NVIDIA's G-Sync has now been reverse-engineered, analyzed, and increasingly criticized. It appears to be little more than a DRM-laden, patent-locked, and license-controlled proprietary implementation of AdaptiveSync, with technically interchangeable performance parameters when compared vs AdaptiveSync/FreeSync.)

    VESA AdaptiveSync is a de-facto standard (becoming an official standard) anyhow, and is (or will be) fully compatible with existing/future FreeSync DVI/HDMI/DP interfaces. Most existing monitors and GPUs could support AdaptiveSync through firmware updates. It also turns out that many "hackers" and "experts" release these firmware updates into public domain.

    Your MG279Q is rated 4ms 144Hz (it should display 144fps~250fps without tearing), and your Titan Xp is currently the fastest GPU card on market (it shouldn't cause tearing unless it can exceed 144fps~250fps, lol). Depending on what games you play and what fps you achieve, you might not ever "see" G-Sync/FreeSync displayed anyhow.

    It has been argued that G-Sync is absolutely and utterly the best. So if you must absolutely and utterly have the best then you need to have a G-Sync monitor and G-Sync GPU. G-Sync monitors invariably cost a lot more (because of the cost of G-Sync modules, only available through NVIDIA), AdaptiveSync/FreeSync monitors tend to cost only a little more. All other things being equal, I think you'd see better graphical quality and performance by spending this money towards GPU card(s) before monitor.

  3. #3
    ROG Guru: Blue Belt Array mdzcpa PC Specs
    mdzcpa PC Specs
    MotherboardMaximus Hero XI
    Processor9900k @ 5.1Ghz All Core 1.315v AVX -2
    Memory (part number)Gskill GTZ 4133 C17 32GB (4x8GB)
    Graphics Card #1ROG Strix 2080 TI OC
    Sound CardOn Board
    MonitorROG PG348Q
    Storage #1Samsung 970 Pro M.2 512GB for OS & APPS
    Storage #2Samsung 970 Pro M.2 1TB for GAMES
    CPU CoolerROG Ryujin 360
    CasePhanteks Evolv X
    Power SupplySeasonic Prime 1000W Titanium
    Keyboard Corsair K70 LUX RGB
    Mouse Corsair M65 RGB
    Headset Corsaur VOID Pro
    Mouse Pad Corsair MM300 Wide Desk Mat
    OS WIN 10 Pro
    Network RouterLinksys VELOP
    Accessory #1 ROG 751JY Laptop for Moobile Gaming
    Accessory #2 Koolance EXC-800 Chiller
    Accessory #3 25+ years of overclocking

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Reputation
    80
    Posts
    965

    Although I will not disagree with any Korth has said above, I will say that I personally recognize, see, feel and enjoy using G-Sync capable systems. It is definitely a visual improvement. What's interesting is that if you are accustomed to seeing the tearing in games, you likely don't even notice it much. However, once you move to G-Sync it's hard to go back as the difference is noticeable. I wouldn't recommend blowing the bank or your budget just to get G-Sync. But if you can swap to a monitor that supports it to use with your GPU that already does, its a nice visual upgrade. As time goes on and your GPU slows from the newer games, that is when G-Sync can really shine.

  4. #4
    iron man Array kkn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Reputation
    243
    Posts
    6,112

    ive had g-sync now for 2 years and loving it.
    2x 1440P 144HZ 27" monitors on 1 980ti card

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •